Skirt! Magazine's visit to Immaulate Consumption
Margaret Pilarski and Sabrina Heise, writers for Skirt! Magazine, visited Columbia as part of their road trip to New Orleans for the 10th anniversary of the Vagina Monologues. On the way, they stopped in our neck of the woods, and conducted a interviews at Immaculate Consumption, a local cafe’ on Main Street.
The idea of these interviews was to find out what womanhood and feminism mean to locals in Columbia, South Carolina. Sabrina and Margaret spoke with women and men about the issue, and among some of the interviewees were TellThem! Program Manager, Morgan Sherman, and fellow grassroots organizer, Kate Hampton of Planned Parenthood Health Systems.
Watch the video. Then check out Skirt! Magazine for yourself.
20080815
January 11, 2008
Contraception Crisis
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center Running Out of Affordable Birth Control
by : Mindy Lucas
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center has been stockpiling birth control pills — but not because administrators anticipate a run on oral contraception, although they might once word gets out that less expensive pills are almost gone.
The health center has been stockpiling pills since January, when the little-known Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 became law. The act effectively eliminated a group discount policy on drugs — key to negotiating with pharmaceutical companies.
“What I believe the act was originally trying to do was reduce spending or control spending on drugs, but the unintended consequence was [that] it eliminated the ability to get this group discount rate and that gave pharmaceutical companies no incentive to offer discounted rates,” says Lauren Vincent, public relations coordinator for the health center.
Brand name birth control pills, such as these, are going up in price at USC’s Thomson Student Health Center.File photo
As a result, birth control pills at the health center have jumped from $12 per pack for a month’s supply to $30 and $45 per pack. And although the health center, located in the heart of the USC campus, continues to offer generic forms of oral contraception, Vincent says for some women, generic might not be an option.
“That’s something they’ll want to discuss with their physician,” she says. “But even the generic is still not going to be $12 a month.”
In the meantime, she says the center has been doing what it can to keep up with the demand for affordable contraception, including stocking pills and letting students who use the facility know of the price increases.
“When we found out, we tried to buy a bulk amount but we’re basically starting to run out,” Vincent says. “We’re trying to let students know it’s not our fault.”
The health center is not alone in struggling to keep affordable contraception on its shelves as a result of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, according to Sarah Gareau, program manager for TellThem!, a statewide grassroots health policy program started by the New Morning Foundation, which is working to reduce teen pregnancy.
“It [the law] has interfered with not only college health clinics, but many community health clinics’ ability to provide name-brand drugs at affordable rates,” says Gareau, adding that pills at community health clinics have jumped from $10 per pack to $50 or more for a month’s supply. “Which is just cost prohibitive for many young people and students,” Gareau says.
She goes on to say that many health advocacy groups and others involved with health issues in the state are concerned that the rising costs of birth control pills might have negative impacts on young women. “We know from research that more than 50 percent of unwanted pregnancies occur among women in their 20s and that’s college age,” Gareau says.
Both Gareau and Vincent are trying to get the word out about the legislation. As a member of the American College Health Association, the health center is pushing for additional legislation to be attached to the act, Vincent says. “We are asking for them to make college health centers exempt from the act,” she says.
Gareau says TellThem!, made up of about 2,000 members, also supports exempting health clinics from the law. She says TellThem! is asking U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., to approach U.S. Rep. John Dingell about the issue. Dingell, D-Mich., chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Clyburn has the pull to ask Dingell to attach the language,” says Gareau, adding that the deadline for attaching the language — Sunday — is fast approaching. And although Gareau says Clyburn, whose district includes part of Richland County, has said he is only willing to speak to his constituents about the issue, Gareau says he should listen to all South Carolinians. “The university sits in his district and serves many of his constituents who will vote in his district.”
Powered by Content Management System - PLANet w3 Magazine - PLANet Systems Group 2007
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center Running Out of Affordable Birth Control
by : Mindy Lucas
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center has been stockpiling birth control pills — but not because administrators anticipate a run on oral contraception, although they might once word gets out that less expensive pills are almost gone.
The health center has been stockpiling pills since January, when the little-known Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 became law. The act effectively eliminated a group discount policy on drugs — key to negotiating with pharmaceutical companies.
“What I believe the act was originally trying to do was reduce spending or control spending on drugs, but the unintended consequence was [that] it eliminated the ability to get this group discount rate and that gave pharmaceutical companies no incentive to offer discounted rates,” says Lauren Vincent, public relations coordinator for the health center.
Brand name birth control pills, such as these, are going up in price at USC’s Thomson Student Health Center.File photo
As a result, birth control pills at the health center have jumped from $12 per pack for a month’s supply to $30 and $45 per pack. And although the health center, located in the heart of the USC campus, continues to offer generic forms of oral contraception, Vincent says for some women, generic might not be an option.
“That’s something they’ll want to discuss with their physician,” she says. “But even the generic is still not going to be $12 a month.”
In the meantime, she says the center has been doing what it can to keep up with the demand for affordable contraception, including stocking pills and letting students who use the facility know of the price increases.
“When we found out, we tried to buy a bulk amount but we’re basically starting to run out,” Vincent says. “We’re trying to let students know it’s not our fault.”
The health center is not alone in struggling to keep affordable contraception on its shelves as a result of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, according to Sarah Gareau, program manager for TellThem!, a statewide grassroots health policy program started by the New Morning Foundation, which is working to reduce teen pregnancy.
“It [the law] has interfered with not only college health clinics, but many community health clinics’ ability to provide name-brand drugs at affordable rates,” says Gareau, adding that pills at community health clinics have jumped from $10 per pack to $50 or more for a month’s supply. “Which is just cost prohibitive for many young people and students,” Gareau says.
She goes on to say that many health advocacy groups and others involved with health issues in the state are concerned that the rising costs of birth control pills might have negative impacts on young women. “We know from research that more than 50 percent of unwanted pregnancies occur among women in their 20s and that’s college age,” Gareau says.
Both Gareau and Vincent are trying to get the word out about the legislation. As a member of the American College Health Association, the health center is pushing for additional legislation to be attached to the act, Vincent says. “We are asking for them to make college health centers exempt from the act,” she says.
Gareau says TellThem!, made up of about 2,000 members, also supports exempting health clinics from the law. She says TellThem! is asking U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., to approach U.S. Rep. John Dingell about the issue. Dingell, D-Mich., chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Clyburn has the pull to ask Dingell to attach the language,” says Gareau, adding that the deadline for attaching the language — Sunday — is fast approaching. And although Gareau says Clyburn, whose district includes part of Richland County, has said he is only willing to speak to his constituents about the issue, Gareau says he should listen to all South Carolinians. “The university sits in his district and serves many of his constituents who will vote in his district.”
Powered by Content Management System - PLANet w3 Magazine - PLANet Systems Group 2007
January 9, 2008
Refusing to address teen births
By BONNIE K. ADAMS
Guest columnist
The State’s Dec. 27 editorial about the nation’s rising teen birth rate expressed appropriate concern about taxpayers’ funds being used to put abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in our schools, stating “we need some assurance that specific programs do work before we keep spending tax money on them.” Indeed.
The editorial also bemoaned that rational conversations about sex education are nearly impossible because the debate about how to address teenage pregnancies is so ideologically charged. While true, it is an oversimplification to suggest that this issue is only about philosophical differences: The sex education debate in the United States is at least as much about the protection of large pots of money benefiting abstinence-only-until-marriage entrepreneurs as it is about genuine philosophical differences.
According to a recent study by USC’s Center for Health Policy and Research, births to young mothers 10-19 cost South Carolina’s taxpayers $156 million annually. When our state budget forecast is dismal, when our schools are hurting and when DHEC needs more funding for family planning clinical services rather than less, $156 million is enough to merit some public attention. Yet, since the Beasley administration, the General Assembly has continued to earmark taxpayer funds for its favorite abstinence-only-until-marriage program providers every year.
The best example is Heritage Community Services, a nonprofit business based in North Charleston. Just 10 years ago and prior to jumping on the abstinence-only-until-marriage bandwagon, Heritage Community Services reported annual revenues of a little more than $50,000. Since that time — due in great measure to the Badgley family’s astute prescience about emerging and potentially profitable state and federal abstinence-only-until-marriage grant streams — Heritage has garnered more than $18 million through state and federal grant revenues. Meanwhile four family members have been compensated: Anne Badgley; her husband, Gordon Badgley; her daughter Sally Badgley Raymond; and Sally’s husband, Jerry Raymond.
Then there is Badgley Enterprises, a separate, for-profit company that is wholly owned by the Badgley family. Badgley Enterprises publishes abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula, which Heritage Community Services purchases with (you guessed it) federal and state grant funds. Little wonder why the Badgleys were featured in last June’s issue of The Nation in an article titled “The Abstinence Gluttons.”
Fifteen states have decided to reject federal money for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and to cease state funding that invites contractors such as Heritage into their public schools. These states’ policymakers have looked at abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, as well as the programs’ providers, and determined that their states’ young people deserve better.
Three of these states are fighting very high rates of AIDS, much as we are in South Carolina. Is it possible that legislators in these states feel an overriding moral imperative to provide uncensored and medically accurate information about condoms to their sexually active youth, who are at risk for HIV infection?
In referring to the increase in the nation’s teen birth rate, The State’s editorial laments “These numbers should call us to action — if only we knew how to act.” We do know how to act. There are science-based curricula that have been evaluated extensively and that have demonstrated effectiveness among a variety of demographic groups. The U.S. Surgeon General has even taken a stand in support of comprehensive sex education. What we lack is not knowledge or expertise, but rather the collective will and the political courage that 14 other states have evidenced.
A nationwide survey of public opinion on sex education in U.S. schools, which was published in the November 2006 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, showed that 82 percent of Americans support comprehensive programs “that teach both abstinence and other methods of preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.” This mirrors research among South Carolina’s own registered voters, 80 percent of whom want similar programs in our schools.
Between 2000 and 2004, the pregnancy rate for South Carolina girls 18-19 years old was 110.5 per 1,000 girls — more similar to the teen birth rates of Afghanistan, Cambodia and Guatemala than to any other developed nation in the world.
Yet, in the next two months, our legislators — beginning with those who serve on the House Ways and Means Committee — will reconsider investing even more taxpayers’ dollars in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, which objective research has shown do not work and which the majority of South Carolina voters do not want.
While journalists may be understandably weary of listening to the wrangling between over-zealous adults who support or oppose sex education, nonetheless South Carolina’s taxpayers cannot afford our Fourth Estate to turn a deaf ear. Too many tax dollars have been wasted. Too many young people need and deserve uncensored, protective health information they’re not getting.
Ms. Adams is executive diretor of New Morning Foundation, a privately funded grant-making foundation, that works to reduce unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections among South Carolina’s young people under age 30.
© 2008 TheState.com and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http://www.thestate.com
By BONNIE K. ADAMS
Guest columnist
The State’s Dec. 27 editorial about the nation’s rising teen birth rate expressed appropriate concern about taxpayers’ funds being used to put abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in our schools, stating “we need some assurance that specific programs do work before we keep spending tax money on them.” Indeed.
The editorial also bemoaned that rational conversations about sex education are nearly impossible because the debate about how to address teenage pregnancies is so ideologically charged. While true, it is an oversimplification to suggest that this issue is only about philosophical differences: The sex education debate in the United States is at least as much about the protection of large pots of money benefiting abstinence-only-until-marriage entrepreneurs as it is about genuine philosophical differences.
According to a recent study by USC’s Center for Health Policy and Research, births to young mothers 10-19 cost South Carolina’s taxpayers $156 million annually. When our state budget forecast is dismal, when our schools are hurting and when DHEC needs more funding for family planning clinical services rather than less, $156 million is enough to merit some public attention. Yet, since the Beasley administration, the General Assembly has continued to earmark taxpayer funds for its favorite abstinence-only-until-marriage program providers every year.
The best example is Heritage Community Services, a nonprofit business based in North Charleston. Just 10 years ago and prior to jumping on the abstinence-only-until-marriage bandwagon, Heritage Community Services reported annual revenues of a little more than $50,000. Since that time — due in great measure to the Badgley family’s astute prescience about emerging and potentially profitable state and federal abstinence-only-until-marriage grant streams — Heritage has garnered more than $18 million through state and federal grant revenues. Meanwhile four family members have been compensated: Anne Badgley; her husband, Gordon Badgley; her daughter Sally Badgley Raymond; and Sally’s husband, Jerry Raymond.
Then there is Badgley Enterprises, a separate, for-profit company that is wholly owned by the Badgley family. Badgley Enterprises publishes abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula, which Heritage Community Services purchases with (you guessed it) federal and state grant funds. Little wonder why the Badgleys were featured in last June’s issue of The Nation in an article titled “The Abstinence Gluttons.”
Fifteen states have decided to reject federal money for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and to cease state funding that invites contractors such as Heritage into their public schools. These states’ policymakers have looked at abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, as well as the programs’ providers, and determined that their states’ young people deserve better.
Three of these states are fighting very high rates of AIDS, much as we are in South Carolina. Is it possible that legislators in these states feel an overriding moral imperative to provide uncensored and medically accurate information about condoms to their sexually active youth, who are at risk for HIV infection?
In referring to the increase in the nation’s teen birth rate, The State’s editorial laments “These numbers should call us to action — if only we knew how to act.” We do know how to act. There are science-based curricula that have been evaluated extensively and that have demonstrated effectiveness among a variety of demographic groups. The U.S. Surgeon General has even taken a stand in support of comprehensive sex education. What we lack is not knowledge or expertise, but rather the collective will and the political courage that 14 other states have evidenced.
A nationwide survey of public opinion on sex education in U.S. schools, which was published in the November 2006 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, showed that 82 percent of Americans support comprehensive programs “that teach both abstinence and other methods of preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.” This mirrors research among South Carolina’s own registered voters, 80 percent of whom want similar programs in our schools.
Between 2000 and 2004, the pregnancy rate for South Carolina girls 18-19 years old was 110.5 per 1,000 girls — more similar to the teen birth rates of Afghanistan, Cambodia and Guatemala than to any other developed nation in the world.
Yet, in the next two months, our legislators — beginning with those who serve on the House Ways and Means Committee — will reconsider investing even more taxpayers’ dollars in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, which objective research has shown do not work and which the majority of South Carolina voters do not want.
While journalists may be understandably weary of listening to the wrangling between over-zealous adults who support or oppose sex education, nonetheless South Carolina’s taxpayers cannot afford our Fourth Estate to turn a deaf ear. Too many tax dollars have been wasted. Too many young people need and deserve uncensored, protective health information they’re not getting.
Ms. Adams is executive diretor of New Morning Foundation, a privately funded grant-making foundation, that works to reduce unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections among South Carolina’s young people under age 30.
© 2008 TheState.com and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http://www.thestate.com
December 10, 2007
"Abstinence sucks as public policy"
Click here to read “Abstinence sucks as public policy,” a blog by Alison Piepmeier, writer for Columbia’s Skirt! Magazine.
Click here to read “Abstinence sucks as public policy,” a blog by Alison Piepmeier, writer for Columbia’s Skirt! Magazine.
December 13, 2007
An Intern's Insight
“In every community there is work to be done. In every nation, there are wounds to heal. In every heart there is the power to do it.” –Marianne Williamson
My name is Divya Reddy and I am a graduate student at the University of South Carolina completing my Masters in Public Health. I have had the pleasure of interning with the New Morning Foundation’s TellThem! network starting in July 2007. Today is my last day. As I prepare for graduation, I look back on my work experience and graciously smile. My experience at the Foundation has been a wonderful eye opener. It has truly given me an insider perspective on the day to day responsibilities of a grassroots organization. It has made me realize what the word ‘grassroots’ means. We work to achieve many of the same goals as other organizations- improving the lives in South Carolina. The theme that ties it all together is that knowledge is power. We want to fight to reduce teen pregnancies in South Carolina and fight for reproductive rights. The state of South Carolina faces many disparities and this forces us to ask the question- how can we make a difference? With the teen pregnancy rate higher than the national average, we must approach the problem with a new plan. Let’s break the cycle of generational teen pregnancies. It’s time to stop turning a blind eye to a problem that needs much attention. Let’s educate the children, teens, and parents through comprehensive sexual education. Let’s partner with schools, communities, and other affiliated organizations. Let’s empower people with factual information to make the best decisions. Let’s spread the word! I type these words with fervor and conviction. My goal is not to persuade you but to reiterate what I have learned. Making a difference starts at the grassroots level. This all takes dedication and energy and starts with a few people who are passionate enough to pursue a cause. I have seen the progress and goals we have accomplished in a short period of time. The strides we make mean that there is more community awareness and involvement. And, I am proud to have worked with people who have the drive and compassion to make a difference. I have enjoyed being part of the New Morning Foundation team and will always take this experience and apply it to my future endeavors
“In every community there is work to be done. In every nation, there are wounds to heal. In every heart there is the power to do it.” –Marianne Williamson
My name is Divya Reddy and I am a graduate student at the University of South Carolina completing my Masters in Public Health. I have had the pleasure of interning with the New Morning Foundation’s TellThem! network starting in July 2007. Today is my last day. As I prepare for graduation, I look back on my work experience and graciously smile. My experience at the Foundation has been a wonderful eye opener. It has truly given me an insider perspective on the day to day responsibilities of a grassroots organization. It has made me realize what the word ‘grassroots’ means. We work to achieve many of the same goals as other organizations- improving the lives in South Carolina. The theme that ties it all together is that knowledge is power. We want to fight to reduce teen pregnancies in South Carolina and fight for reproductive rights. The state of South Carolina faces many disparities and this forces us to ask the question- how can we make a difference? With the teen pregnancy rate higher than the national average, we must approach the problem with a new plan. Let’s break the cycle of generational teen pregnancies. It’s time to stop turning a blind eye to a problem that needs much attention. Let’s educate the children, teens, and parents through comprehensive sexual education. Let’s partner with schools, communities, and other affiliated organizations. Let’s empower people with factual information to make the best decisions. Let’s spread the word! I type these words with fervor and conviction. My goal is not to persuade you but to reiterate what I have learned. Making a difference starts at the grassroots level. This all takes dedication and energy and starts with a few people who are passionate enough to pursue a cause. I have seen the progress and goals we have accomplished in a short period of time. The strides we make mean that there is more community awareness and involvement. And, I am proud to have worked with people who have the drive and compassion to make a difference. I have enjoyed being part of the New Morning Foundation team and will always take this experience and apply it to my future endeavors
November 5, 2007
Columbia NOW: 1972 to the Present
In March 1972, Mary Heriot and Vicki Eslinger formed the Greater Columbia NOW (National Organization for Women) Chapter. Inspired by Betty Friedan and the growing presence of NOW around the country, they got to work quickly.One of their first actions was with The State newspaper. In 1972, job advertisements were listed separately as male and female help wanted. Under the female side, the only jobs listed were for teachers, maids, and nurses. NOW representation went to speak with The State’s managing editor, only to be thrown out of his office. For over two months, NOW sent copies of the ads to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, spurring the EEOC to send letters to The State. In a few weeks, they listed all the jobs together.
But today, we still face many issues. The S.C. Legislature currently has several bills that NOW does not support. Most notable is H.3355 and S.84, otherwise known as the ultrasound abortion bills. They started out requiring that a woman sign a statement that she viewed her ultrasound before obtaining an abortion. Currently, the Senate has removed that requirement from the House bill and is pushing it in Conference Committee. However, the House is still pushing for the requirement, without even an exception for rape or incest victims. Another issue is S.27, the Pharmacy Refusal Bill, which would allow a pharmacist to refuse to fill a prescription for birth control or emergency contraception for moral or religious reasons.
We have joined with Planned Parenthood in their Fill My Pills Campaign, which send volunteers out to pharmacies in the Columbia area to make sure they have emergency contraception available. They have generously allowed us to use their facilities for our chapter meetings.
In the spring, we hope to continue our partnerships with Tell Them!, the South Carolina Equality Coalition, and Planned Parenthood. We will have regular monthly meetings, speakers, letter writing parties, and so much more. There is something for everyone, whether you want to stand up at a rally or write letters to the editor.
Our next meeting will be on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:00 PM, at the Planned Parenthood office at 2712 Middleburg Drive #107, Columbia, SC 29204. If you are interested in being added to our contact list, email us at columbiascnow@gmail.com. You can get more information at www.now.org. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Mae WilsonGreater Columbia NOWChapter President
October 26, 2007
Not Only Abstinence
Below is a Letter to the Editor, submitted to the Post and Courier, written by Lanita Patterson.
Not only abstinence
In response to an Oct. 14 letter to the editor: As a health-care provider, Planned Parenthood knows first-hand the power of education to help individuals make responsible decisions about their health.
While working in the field as a community health educator, I have witnessed first-hand how abstinence-only programs fail our youth. Abstinence-only programs deny our teenagers medically accurate information about birth control and sexually transmitted infections.
South Carolina has the nation’s eighth highest birth rate for 15- to 17-year-olds. Isn’t it time our state focuses on greater access to information and education that helps prevent unintended pregnancies and promotes healthy women and healthy families?
South Carolina needs to help our teenagers protect themselves against unintended pregnancies, HIV/AIDS, and other sexually transmitted diseases. Abstinence first, but not only.
LANITA PATTERSON
S.C. Community Health Educator
Planned Parenthood Health Systems
1722 Marley Drive
Columbia
Below is a Letter to the Editor, submitted to the Post and Courier, written by Lanita Patterson.
Not only abstinence
In response to an Oct. 14 letter to the editor: As a health-care provider, Planned Parenthood knows first-hand the power of education to help individuals make responsible decisions about their health.
While working in the field as a community health educator, I have witnessed first-hand how abstinence-only programs fail our youth. Abstinence-only programs deny our teenagers medically accurate information about birth control and sexually transmitted infections.
South Carolina has the nation’s eighth highest birth rate for 15- to 17-year-olds. Isn’t it time our state focuses on greater access to information and education that helps prevent unintended pregnancies and promotes healthy women and healthy families?
South Carolina needs to help our teenagers protect themselves against unintended pregnancies, HIV/AIDS, and other sexually transmitted diseases. Abstinence first, but not only.
LANITA PATTERSON
S.C. Community Health Educator
Planned Parenthood Health Systems
1722 Marley Drive
Columbia
October 17, 2007
Love Your Body Day
At TellThem! we believe that part of living a healthier, more satisfying life is having a positive self-image.
In American society, much of how women view themselves stems from what we see and hear in the media. Unfortunately images of airbrushed models have been emphasized so much that many women have forgotten how to appreciate themselves completely–just the way they are.
But the National Organization of Women (NOW) Foundation hasn’t forgotten. In fact, they’ve declared October 18 Love Your Body Day. Visit the Love Your Body campaign website for more information on what you can do, send an e-card to your friends, take a body image survey, or check out the positive and offensive ways women are portrayed in advertisements. If you’re feeling creative, you can even participate in the Love Your Body poster contest or learn how to organize your own event.
By celebrating Love Your Body Day, you’re offering support and encouragement to women everywhere, and most importantly, remembering to celebrate yourself.
Beryl Roda of Silver Spring, Maryland is the Love Your Body: 2007 Poster Contest Grand Prize Winner. To see other winning designs and positive messages click here.
At TellThem! we believe that part of living a healthier, more satisfying life is having a positive self-image.
In American society, much of how women view themselves stems from what we see and hear in the media. Unfortunately images of airbrushed models have been emphasized so much that many women have forgotten how to appreciate themselves completely–just the way they are.
But the National Organization of Women (NOW) Foundation hasn’t forgotten. In fact, they’ve declared October 18 Love Your Body Day. Visit the Love Your Body campaign website for more information on what you can do, send an e-card to your friends, take a body image survey, or check out the positive and offensive ways women are portrayed in advertisements. If you’re feeling creative, you can even participate in the Love Your Body poster contest or learn how to organize your own event.
By celebrating Love Your Body Day, you’re offering support and encouragement to women everywhere, and most importantly, remembering to celebrate yourself.
Beryl Roda of Silver Spring, Maryland is the Love Your Body: 2007 Poster Contest Grand Prize Winner. To see other winning designs and positive messages click here.
October 10, 2007
October is Let's Talk Month
October is Let’s Talk Month, a national public education campaign coordinated by Advocates For Youth. This month, organizations, schools, businesses, religious institutions and health providers will get together to plan activities that foster open dialogue about sexuality between parents and their children.
You may not have known, but most children receive their knowledge about sex from their parents. Even though parents are generally well-informed about sexuality, they often don’t know how to communicate their ideas effectively.
That’s why Advocates For Youth suggests that parents and legal guardians review a list of “Door Openers” and “Door Slammers” or ways to support or discourage those conversations.
The website also includes Messages Worth Repeating and activities you can participate in to acknowledge Let’s Talk Month.
If you’re a parent or guardian and you’re wondering what your child may want to know about sex, the Advocates For Youth website has also listed examples of questions from preschoolers, preteens, and teenagers to give you an idea of what to cover.
By recognizing Let’s Talk Month, you will not only share your knowledge about sexuality with your child, but you may learn something too. Information makes all the difference.
To learn more, click here.
October is Let’s Talk Month, a national public education campaign coordinated by Advocates For Youth. This month, organizations, schools, businesses, religious institutions and health providers will get together to plan activities that foster open dialogue about sexuality between parents and their children.
You may not have known, but most children receive their knowledge about sex from their parents. Even though parents are generally well-informed about sexuality, they often don’t know how to communicate their ideas effectively.
That’s why Advocates For Youth suggests that parents and legal guardians review a list of “Door Openers” and “Door Slammers” or ways to support or discourage those conversations.
The website also includes Messages Worth Repeating and activities you can participate in to acknowledge Let’s Talk Month.
If you’re a parent or guardian and you’re wondering what your child may want to know about sex, the Advocates For Youth website has also listed examples of questions from preschoolers, preteens, and teenagers to give you an idea of what to cover.
By recognizing Let’s Talk Month, you will not only share your knowledge about sexuality with your child, but you may learn something too. Information makes all the difference.
To learn more, click here.
October 9, 2007
.JPG)
Project HOPE and Teen Health Center
Beverly Hart Pittman, Director of Project HOPE and Teen Health CenterProject HOPE (Healthy Options, Positive Effects) is a teen pregnancy prevention program
managed by Richland Community Health Partners and funded by the New Morning Foundation to serve teens in the Eau Claire and surrounding communities.
managed by Richland Community Health Partners and funded by the New Morning Foundation to serve teens in the Eau Claire and surrounding communities.
At the Teen Health Center, we offer FREE CONFIDENTIAL SERVICES to teens.
Our mission is to reduce teen pregnancy and promote healthy behaviors among youth. The primary message teens receive is “don’t engage in sexual activities before you are married”; and the secondary message is “but, if you do protect yourself.” The staff members are: Beverly Hart Pittman, MSW, LISW, Director; Shanta Pinckney, RN, Nurse; Dorthea Lewis, MHP, Community/Faith-Based Coordinator; and Cassandra Lindsey-Nesbitt, MSW, School-Based Coordinator.
The Teen Health Center, located at 4419 Fair Street, offers FREE CONFIDENTIAL Services to teens Monday thru Friday from 2:30 PM until 6:00 PM and by appointment. We offer free pregnancy testing, free SDT (sexually Transmitted diseases) testing and free birth control (pills, Nuva Ring, Depo shots, condoms and film). The Morning After Pill (EC) will soon be available. Teens visiting the Center can use our computer, read, play board games, listen to music or ‘just talk’ to the staff. The nurse is available by phone at 351-4478.
Recently, a teen reported that “The Teen Health Center has inspired me. As I come to the Teen Health Center I learn more and more. The Teen Health Center has made me realize how important things in life are. I never knew how serious the STDs are that are going around in South Carolina today. They can have such bad consequences; and look so disgusting. The Teen Health Center is a great place to go to talk and find out new things about life.” -Olivia
It truly takes a village to address teen pregnancy. Project HOPE staff also joins schools, community and faith-based agencies in the Eau Claire community to plan and implement programs and activities to reach youth, parents and youth advocates. These programs/activities address abstinence; puberty; good decision making and communication skills; sexuality; sexually transmitted diseases; contraception; and relationship issues. We have held Teen Grill and Chill workshops; Becoming a Responsible Teen Program; Spirituality and Sexuality Workshop series; and Keeping it Real Faith-Based Program for teens and adults. According to evaluations, participants report that Project HOPE/Teen Health Center events are: well organized; held in a warm, loving environment; educational; offer very good, important information on needed issues; and I love the positive affect they have on our community.
For additional information about Project HOPE/Teen Health Center’s services and upcoming events, please call Beverly Hart Pittman at 253-7521 or Dorthea Lewis at 733-5449. The website address is www.myspace.com/teenhealthcenter
Our mission is to reduce teen pregnancy and promote healthy behaviors among youth. The primary message teens receive is “don’t engage in sexual activities before you are married”; and the secondary message is “but, if you do protect yourself.” The staff members are: Beverly Hart Pittman, MSW, LISW, Director; Shanta Pinckney, RN, Nurse; Dorthea Lewis, MHP, Community/Faith-Based Coordinator; and Cassandra Lindsey-Nesbitt, MSW, School-Based Coordinator.
The Teen Health Center, located at 4419 Fair Street, offers FREE CONFIDENTIAL Services to teens Monday thru Friday from 2:30 PM until 6:00 PM and by appointment. We offer free pregnancy testing, free SDT (sexually Transmitted diseases) testing and free birth control (pills, Nuva Ring, Depo shots, condoms and film). The Morning After Pill (EC) will soon be available. Teens visiting the Center can use our computer, read, play board games, listen to music or ‘just talk’ to the staff. The nurse is available by phone at 351-4478.
Recently, a teen reported that “The Teen Health Center has inspired me. As I come to the Teen Health Center I learn more and more. The Teen Health Center has made me realize how important things in life are. I never knew how serious the STDs are that are going around in South Carolina today. They can have such bad consequences; and look so disgusting. The Teen Health Center is a great place to go to talk and find out new things about life.” -Olivia
It truly takes a village to address teen pregnancy. Project HOPE staff also joins schools, community and faith-based agencies in the Eau Claire community to plan and implement programs and activities to reach youth, parents and youth advocates. These programs/activities address abstinence; puberty; good decision making and communication skills; sexuality; sexually transmitted diseases; contraception; and relationship issues. We have held Teen Grill and Chill workshops; Becoming a Responsible Teen Program; Spirituality and Sexuality Workshop series; and Keeping it Real Faith-Based Program for teens and adults. According to evaluations, participants report that Project HOPE/Teen Health Center events are: well organized; held in a warm, loving environment; educational; offer very good, important information on needed issues; and I love the positive affect they have on our community.
For additional information about Project HOPE/Teen Health Center’s services and upcoming events, please call Beverly Hart Pittman at 253-7521 or Dorthea Lewis at 733-5449. The website address is www.myspace.com/teenhealthcenter
October 4, 2007
Birth Control Watch
Birth Control Watch is a joint project of the Women Donors Network (WDN) and the Communications Consortium Media Center (CCMC). Their motto is contraception with out exception, and we could not agree more, which is why we are supporting the Birth Control Protection Act.
According to their site, “WDN, a nonprofit organization, is a philanthropic community for those who refuse to accept the status quo. From supporting voter registration efforts, to funding international programs assisting women’s quests for economic independence, WDN unites powerful, visionary women who are committed to effecting lasting fundamental change.”The Communications Consortium Media Center, another nonprofit organization, is a “public interest media center dedicated to helping nonprofit organizations use media and new technologies as tools for policy change”.
Plan A, featured on the Birth Control Watch homepage, is “a project of the National Council of Jewish Women, and is an initiative to educate and empower individuals to advocate for women’s universal access to contraceptive information and health services at the community level”. The National Council of Jewish Women advocates on behalf of children, women’s rights and reproductive freedom and has a nation-wide network of 90,000 members and supporters.
Birth Control Watch advocates for the following:1) Safety and Access2) Insurance Coverage3) Pharmacies Filling Prescriptions4) Equality5) Supporting All Women6) Comprehensive Sex Education7) Prevention First
Their site offers suggestions on questions to ask Congress this year, has an active blog, and includes an activist center where you can sign up for e-alerts. Check it out…
Birth Control Watch is a joint project of the Women Donors Network (WDN) and the Communications Consortium Media Center (CCMC). Their motto is contraception with out exception, and we could not agree more, which is why we are supporting the Birth Control Protection Act.
According to their site, “WDN, a nonprofit organization, is a philanthropic community for those who refuse to accept the status quo. From supporting voter registration efforts, to funding international programs assisting women’s quests for economic independence, WDN unites powerful, visionary women who are committed to effecting lasting fundamental change.”The Communications Consortium Media Center, another nonprofit organization, is a “public interest media center dedicated to helping nonprofit organizations use media and new technologies as tools for policy change”.
Plan A, featured on the Birth Control Watch homepage, is “a project of the National Council of Jewish Women, and is an initiative to educate and empower individuals to advocate for women’s universal access to contraceptive information and health services at the community level”. The National Council of Jewish Women advocates on behalf of children, women’s rights and reproductive freedom and has a nation-wide network of 90,000 members and supporters.
Birth Control Watch advocates for the following:1) Safety and Access2) Insurance Coverage3) Pharmacies Filling Prescriptions4) Equality5) Supporting All Women6) Comprehensive Sex Education7) Prevention First
Their site offers suggestions on questions to ask Congress this year, has an active blog, and includes an activist center where you can sign up for e-alerts. Check it out…
October 3, 2007
Medicaid Policies for Covering Emergency Contraception
On August 24, 2006, the FDA approved that EC could be sold behind-the-counter to women age 18 and older. Women under 18 are still required to get a prescription. According to the National Health Law Program, “this dual-label classification has raised a number of questions regarding how states are covering Plan B® for Medicaid-eligible women”. Some states could introduce Medicaid policies that “complicate access to Plan B® or exclude coverage altogether for low-income women” (NHeLP).
According to NHeLP’s report “Over the Counter or Out of Reach?: A Report on Evolving State Medicaid Policies for Covering Emergency Contraception”, South Carolina does not have a clear state policy after August 2006 that Medicaid will cover EC/Plan B® as an over the counter drug. EC is also not included on a Medicaid drug list, formulary, or PDL updated after August 2006. Likewise, a prescription is required for EC reimbursement under a 2005 or post-August 2006 pharmacy policy.
The good news is that prior authorization is not required for reimbursement of EC. Furthermore, reimbursement is possible in general for OTC drugs not specifically listed in agency regulations or documents through prior authorization. This means that EC could be included on the list.
So, what can you do to ensure that low income women in SC are still able to get their EC covered by Medicaid? The document “Emergency Contraception & Medicaid: A State-by-State Analysis and Advocate’s Toolkit” provides a lot of useful information and an action kit for advocates.
Follow the below action plan and checklist and contact the South Carolina Emergency Contraceptive Initiative to volunteer to become more involved.
An Action Plan for Advocates (read the details in the report)Action 1: Determine the Status of Medicaid Coverage of EC in Your StateAction 2: If Plan B® is Covered, Determine the Access BarriersAction 3: Document and Report Barrier IssuesAction 4: Educate Medicaid PersonnelAction 5: Educate Medicaid Recipients
Checklist: Do Medicaid Barriers to EC Access Exist in My State?□ How easy is it to find out whether Medicaid covers Plan B® in your state?□ Do you have a Medicaid drug formulary in your state?□ Is Plan B® listed on the formulary?□ If Plan B® is not listed on the formulary, what is the process for getting it on the formulary?□ Is Preven listed?□ How easy is it to obtain Plan B® if you are on Medicaid?□ Are individuals being charged co-pays?□ Does a Medicaid recipient need to obtain prior authorization for coverage of Plan B®?□ If so, are recipients receiving an emergency supply and a response within 24 hours?□ Do Medicaid personnel and websites provide accurate information about EC and coverage?□ Are there other utilization controls in place, such as a limit on the number of refills?□ Are individuals being forced to pay for EC out-of-pocket?□ Are there other barriers facing Medicaid recipients accessing EC?□ Are clinics and providers being reimbursed in a timely manner?□ Does your state enroll Medicaid beneficiaries into managed care plans on a mandatory basis?□ Is EC excluded from the managed care plan’s scope of covered benefits?□ If you are in a ‘pharmacy access’ state, you might want to ask these additional questions.□ What is the process for Medicaid reimbursement when obtaining EC from a pharmacy?□ Do pharmacists get reimbursed for time spent counseling patients?
On August 24, 2006, the FDA approved that EC could be sold behind-the-counter to women age 18 and older. Women under 18 are still required to get a prescription. According to the National Health Law Program, “this dual-label classification has raised a number of questions regarding how states are covering Plan B® for Medicaid-eligible women”. Some states could introduce Medicaid policies that “complicate access to Plan B® or exclude coverage altogether for low-income women” (NHeLP).
According to NHeLP’s report “Over the Counter or Out of Reach?: A Report on Evolving State Medicaid Policies for Covering Emergency Contraception”, South Carolina does not have a clear state policy after August 2006 that Medicaid will cover EC/Plan B® as an over the counter drug. EC is also not included on a Medicaid drug list, formulary, or PDL updated after August 2006. Likewise, a prescription is required for EC reimbursement under a 2005 or post-August 2006 pharmacy policy.
The good news is that prior authorization is not required for reimbursement of EC. Furthermore, reimbursement is possible in general for OTC drugs not specifically listed in agency regulations or documents through prior authorization. This means that EC could be included on the list.
So, what can you do to ensure that low income women in SC are still able to get their EC covered by Medicaid? The document “Emergency Contraception & Medicaid: A State-by-State Analysis and Advocate’s Toolkit” provides a lot of useful information and an action kit for advocates.
Follow the below action plan and checklist and contact the South Carolina Emergency Contraceptive Initiative to volunteer to become more involved.
An Action Plan for Advocates (read the details in the report)Action 1: Determine the Status of Medicaid Coverage of EC in Your StateAction 2: If Plan B® is Covered, Determine the Access BarriersAction 3: Document and Report Barrier IssuesAction 4: Educate Medicaid PersonnelAction 5: Educate Medicaid Recipients
Checklist: Do Medicaid Barriers to EC Access Exist in My State?□ How easy is it to find out whether Medicaid covers Plan B® in your state?□ Do you have a Medicaid drug formulary in your state?□ Is Plan B® listed on the formulary?□ If Plan B® is not listed on the formulary, what is the process for getting it on the formulary?□ Is Preven listed?□ How easy is it to obtain Plan B® if you are on Medicaid?□ Are individuals being charged co-pays?□ Does a Medicaid recipient need to obtain prior authorization for coverage of Plan B®?□ If so, are recipients receiving an emergency supply and a response within 24 hours?□ Do Medicaid personnel and websites provide accurate information about EC and coverage?□ Are there other utilization controls in place, such as a limit on the number of refills?□ Are individuals being forced to pay for EC out-of-pocket?□ Are there other barriers facing Medicaid recipients accessing EC?□ Are clinics and providers being reimbursed in a timely manner?□ Does your state enroll Medicaid beneficiaries into managed care plans on a mandatory basis?□ Is EC excluded from the managed care plan’s scope of covered benefits?□ If you are in a ‘pharmacy access’ state, you might want to ask these additional questions.□ What is the process for Medicaid reimbursement when obtaining EC from a pharmacy?□ Do pharmacists get reimbursed for time spent counseling patients?
September 28, 2007
A Sex Ed Digital Video Contest
Why is Sex So Interesting?And Sex-Ed So Boring?
Are you between the ages of 15 and 30 years old? Do you know someone who is? Are you a sex-ed or health education teacher? A cool parent who wants to make sure all young people have access to science-based, medically accurate sexuality education to help them live healthy and happy lives?
RH Reality Check, in partnership with Advocates for Youth, SIECUS, Isis, Inc., and the National Sexuality Resource Center (NSRC) are hosting:
Fresh Focus: A Sex Ed Digital Video Contest
Enter on your own, with a team or make it a class project!Shoot. Submit. Win. That’s all there is to it!
You’ve got two themes to choose from:Theme 1. Share your sex ed experience so far. Show us how and why it sucked or rocked. In three minutes or less.Theme 2. Redesign how sex ed could be delivered. Imagine that anything is possible. In three minutes or less.
It’s easy! And there are amazing prizes! First prize is $3500 in the form of a scholarship to the institution of your choice or cash, second prize is $1000, and third prize gets you your choice of a Nikon P5000, Nintendo Wii, or an iPhone!
Looking for more information?
Visit their contest page for details, rules and submission information! Are you ready to submit? Visit the submission page hosted by Dogoodertv!
The deadline is December 31, 2008 so grab a camera and start shooting! They’ll be waiting…
Why is Sex So Interesting?And Sex-Ed So Boring?
Are you between the ages of 15 and 30 years old? Do you know someone who is? Are you a sex-ed or health education teacher? A cool parent who wants to make sure all young people have access to science-based, medically accurate sexuality education to help them live healthy and happy lives?
RH Reality Check, in partnership with Advocates for Youth, SIECUS, Isis, Inc., and the National Sexuality Resource Center (NSRC) are hosting:
Fresh Focus: A Sex Ed Digital Video Contest
Enter on your own, with a team or make it a class project!Shoot. Submit. Win. That’s all there is to it!
You’ve got two themes to choose from:Theme 1. Share your sex ed experience so far. Show us how and why it sucked or rocked. In three minutes or less.Theme 2. Redesign how sex ed could be delivered. Imagine that anything is possible. In three minutes or less.
It’s easy! And there are amazing prizes! First prize is $3500 in the form of a scholarship to the institution of your choice or cash, second prize is $1000, and third prize gets you your choice of a Nikon P5000, Nintendo Wii, or an iPhone!
Looking for more information?
Visit their contest page for details, rules and submission information! Are you ready to submit? Visit the submission page hosted by Dogoodertv!
The deadline is December 31, 2008 so grab a camera and start shooting! They’ll be waiting…
September 27, 2007
Kudos to the Free Times
A big thank you goes out to the Free Times, Columbia’s free weekly newspaper for covering the issue of skyrocketing birth control prices at USC’s health center in their article Contraception Crisis.
The article discusses the fact that a poorly crafted provision of Congress’ 2006 Deficit Reduction Act changed the rule allowing pharmaceutical companies to offer some providers low-cost drugs — ultimately making it harder for college and university health clinics, including USC, to offer students affordable birth control!
Maybe this wonderful article will encourage Rep. Clyburn to ask Rep. Dingell to attach the fix language to the Act before the deadline of this Sunday, Sept. 30th. Young people need to be able to afford birth control, especially on college campuses!
To read more about this issue, click here.
Contraception CrisisUSC’s Thomson Student Health Center Running Out of Affordable Birth Controlby: Mindy Lucas
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center has been stockpiling birth control pills — but not because administrators anticipate a run on oral contraception, although they might once word gets out that less expensive pills are almost gone.
The health center has been stockpiling pills since January, when the little-known Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 became law. The act effectively eliminated a group discount policy on drugs — key to negotiating with pharmaceutical companies.
“What I believe the act was originally trying to do was reduce spending or control spending on drugs, but the unintended consequence was [that] it eliminated the ability to get this group discount rate and that gave pharmaceutical companies no incentive to offer discounted rates,” says Lauren Vincent, public relations coordinator for the health center.
Brand name birth control pills, such as these, are going up in price at USC’s Thomson Student Health Center.File photo
As a result, birth control pills at the health center have jumped from $12 per pack for a month’s supply to $30 and $45 per pack. And although the health center, located in the heart of the USC campus, continues to offer generic forms of oral contraception, Vincent says for some women, generic might not be an option.
“That’s something they’ll want to discuss with their physician,” she says. “But even the generic is still not going to be $12 a month.”
In the meantime, she says the center has been doing what it can to keep up with the demand for affordable contraception, including stocking pills and letting students who use the facility know of the price increases.
“When we found out, we tried to buy a bulk amount but we’re basically starting to run out,” Vincent says. “We’re trying to let students know it’s not our fault.”
The health center is not alone in struggling to keep affordable contraception on its shelves as a result of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, according to Sarah Gareau, program manager for TellThem!, a statewide grassroots health policy program started by the New Morning Foundation, which is working to reduce teen pregnancy.
“It [the law] has interfered with not only college health clinics, but many community health clinics’ ability to provide name-brand drugs at affordable rates,” says Gareau, adding that pills at community health clinics have jumped from $10 per pack to $50 or more for a month’s supply. “Which is just cost prohibitive for many young people and students,” Gareau says.
She goes on to say that many health advocacy groups and others involved with health issues in the state are concerned that the rising costs of birth control pills might have negative impacts on young women. “We know from research that more than 50 percent of unwanted pregnancies occur among women in their 20s and that’s college age,” Gareau says.
Both Gareau and Vincent are trying to get the word out about the legislation. As a member of the American College Health Association, the health center is pushing for additional legislation to be attached to the act, Vincent says. “We are asking for them to make college health centers exempt from the act,” she says.
Gareau says TellThem!, made up of about 2,000 members, also supports exempting health clinics from the law. She says TellThem! is asking U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., to approach U.S. Rep. John Dingell about the issue. Dingell, D-Mich., chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Clyburn has the pull to ask Dingell to attach the language,” says Gareau, adding that the deadline for attaching the language — Sunday — is fast approaching. And although Gareau says Clyburn, whose district includes part of Richland County, has said he is only willing to speak to his constituents about the issue, Gareau says he should listen to all South Carolinians. “The university sits in his district and serves many of his constituents who will vote in his district.”
A big thank you goes out to the Free Times, Columbia’s free weekly newspaper for covering the issue of skyrocketing birth control prices at USC’s health center in their article Contraception Crisis.
The article discusses the fact that a poorly crafted provision of Congress’ 2006 Deficit Reduction Act changed the rule allowing pharmaceutical companies to offer some providers low-cost drugs — ultimately making it harder for college and university health clinics, including USC, to offer students affordable birth control!
Maybe this wonderful article will encourage Rep. Clyburn to ask Rep. Dingell to attach the fix language to the Act before the deadline of this Sunday, Sept. 30th. Young people need to be able to afford birth control, especially on college campuses!
To read more about this issue, click here.
Contraception CrisisUSC’s Thomson Student Health Center Running Out of Affordable Birth Controlby: Mindy Lucas
USC’s Thomson Student Health Center has been stockpiling birth control pills — but not because administrators anticipate a run on oral contraception, although they might once word gets out that less expensive pills are almost gone.
The health center has been stockpiling pills since January, when the little-known Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 became law. The act effectively eliminated a group discount policy on drugs — key to negotiating with pharmaceutical companies.
“What I believe the act was originally trying to do was reduce spending or control spending on drugs, but the unintended consequence was [that] it eliminated the ability to get this group discount rate and that gave pharmaceutical companies no incentive to offer discounted rates,” says Lauren Vincent, public relations coordinator for the health center.
Brand name birth control pills, such as these, are going up in price at USC’s Thomson Student Health Center.File photo
As a result, birth control pills at the health center have jumped from $12 per pack for a month’s supply to $30 and $45 per pack. And although the health center, located in the heart of the USC campus, continues to offer generic forms of oral contraception, Vincent says for some women, generic might not be an option.
“That’s something they’ll want to discuss with their physician,” she says. “But even the generic is still not going to be $12 a month.”
In the meantime, she says the center has been doing what it can to keep up with the demand for affordable contraception, including stocking pills and letting students who use the facility know of the price increases.
“When we found out, we tried to buy a bulk amount but we’re basically starting to run out,” Vincent says. “We’re trying to let students know it’s not our fault.”
The health center is not alone in struggling to keep affordable contraception on its shelves as a result of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, according to Sarah Gareau, program manager for TellThem!, a statewide grassroots health policy program started by the New Morning Foundation, which is working to reduce teen pregnancy.
“It [the law] has interfered with not only college health clinics, but many community health clinics’ ability to provide name-brand drugs at affordable rates,” says Gareau, adding that pills at community health clinics have jumped from $10 per pack to $50 or more for a month’s supply. “Which is just cost prohibitive for many young people and students,” Gareau says.
She goes on to say that many health advocacy groups and others involved with health issues in the state are concerned that the rising costs of birth control pills might have negative impacts on young women. “We know from research that more than 50 percent of unwanted pregnancies occur among women in their 20s and that’s college age,” Gareau says.
Both Gareau and Vincent are trying to get the word out about the legislation. As a member of the American College Health Association, the health center is pushing for additional legislation to be attached to the act, Vincent says. “We are asking for them to make college health centers exempt from the act,” she says.
Gareau says TellThem!, made up of about 2,000 members, also supports exempting health clinics from the law. She says TellThem! is asking U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., to approach U.S. Rep. John Dingell about the issue. Dingell, D-Mich., chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Clyburn has the pull to ask Dingell to attach the language,” says Gareau, adding that the deadline for attaching the language — Sunday — is fast approaching. And although Gareau says Clyburn, whose district includes part of Richland County, has said he is only willing to speak to his constituents about the issue, Gareau says he should listen to all South Carolinians. “The university sits in his district and serves many of his constituents who will vote in his district.”
September 23, 2007
President Threatens to Veto SCHIP
According to Politico, despite a clear veto threat from President Bush, Democratic and Republican negotiators on Friday announced a breakthrough deal on the children’s health insurance program, agreeing to expand the initiative by $35 billion in an attempt to provide health care to million more uninsured children. The compromise will closely mirror the bipartisan Senate bill, which passed this summer 68-31, with enough support to override an eventual veto (Source).
Created in 1997, SCHIP is a national federal/state health insurance program for low-income children whose families’ incomes are too high to qualify for Medicaid but too low to afford private health insurance, and whose parents count among the nation’s working uninsured. Due in large part to this program, the percentage of low-income children in the United States without health coverage has fallen by one-third, despite the erosion of private health coverage over this period. More than 4 million low-income children, most of whom would otherwise be uninsured, are enrolled in SCHIP.
This remarkable success, however, is now threatened. Unlike Medicaid, an entitlement program whose federal funding increases automatically to compensate for increases in health-care costs (as well as increases in caseloads), SCHIP is a block grant with a fixed annual funding level. Consequently, the federal SCHIP funding that states receive has not been keeping pace with the rising cost of health care or population growth. (Source).
Included in the House version of the legislation is a provision that would allow states—without having to go through a cumbersome waiver process—to expand Medicaid coverage for contraception up to the level of Medicaid coverage for pregnancy-related care. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the state option to expand family planning likely would produce savings to the federal government of $200 million over five years and $400 million over 10 years (Source). This provision was not included in the original Senate version.
If President Bush vetoes the bill, Congress will extend it temporarily while negotiations continue with the White House.
Want to know more about this issue, read the Kaiser Family Foundation’s SCHIP Reauthorization: Key Questions in the Debate or the opinion in the NY Times.
According to Politico, despite a clear veto threat from President Bush, Democratic and Republican negotiators on Friday announced a breakthrough deal on the children’s health insurance program, agreeing to expand the initiative by $35 billion in an attempt to provide health care to million more uninsured children. The compromise will closely mirror the bipartisan Senate bill, which passed this summer 68-31, with enough support to override an eventual veto (Source).
Created in 1997, SCHIP is a national federal/state health insurance program for low-income children whose families’ incomes are too high to qualify for Medicaid but too low to afford private health insurance, and whose parents count among the nation’s working uninsured. Due in large part to this program, the percentage of low-income children in the United States without health coverage has fallen by one-third, despite the erosion of private health coverage over this period. More than 4 million low-income children, most of whom would otherwise be uninsured, are enrolled in SCHIP.
This remarkable success, however, is now threatened. Unlike Medicaid, an entitlement program whose federal funding increases automatically to compensate for increases in health-care costs (as well as increases in caseloads), SCHIP is a block grant with a fixed annual funding level. Consequently, the federal SCHIP funding that states receive has not been keeping pace with the rising cost of health care or population growth. (Source).
Included in the House version of the legislation is a provision that would allow states—without having to go through a cumbersome waiver process—to expand Medicaid coverage for contraception up to the level of Medicaid coverage for pregnancy-related care. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the state option to expand family planning likely would produce savings to the federal government of $200 million over five years and $400 million over 10 years (Source). This provision was not included in the original Senate version.
If President Bush vetoes the bill, Congress will extend it temporarily while negotiations continue with the White House.
Want to know more about this issue, read the Kaiser Family Foundation’s SCHIP Reauthorization: Key Questions in the Debate or the opinion in the NY Times.
September 18, 2007
We Need to Tell Them
We need to Tell Them, both boys and girls, that having sex isn’t finding love. This is difficult to understand, given the way romance is portrayed in movies and on TV, of course. This relates to my second message: We need to make sure we purchase NOTHING that uses sex to sell. It’s a cheap, ugly ploy by advertisers that if you use a given toothpaste or drive a certain car, you’re sexy. This, of course, furthers the concept that being sexy is a necessary ingredient to the glamour of living in a TV commercial, which we’re all taught is the way to live, just by the constant barrage of those very commercials! It’s a dangerous mind-warping fact of life for too many Americans, especially in places like South Carolina, where’s there’s virtually nothing to do that doesn’t involve spending money. Few people in SC have money. So many kids find comfort and fun in sex.
Girls bear the brunt of all this social irresponsibility. Perhaps if we could find a way for boys to suffer life-debilitating consequences of teenage pregnancy, they’d be more careful about playing around with sex - and perhaps their parents would begin to understand the need for sex education and condoms. As long as boys can go play their sports and pretty much suffer no consequences of getting girls pregnant, there will be no change in teen pregnancy rates. Classes that dwell on shame and fear will have no effect on teenagers, given teenagers’ tendency to believe nothing bad can happen to them! The only way we’ll see changes will be to change the adult contribution to society.
To sum up, that change must come from not supporting corporations who make it cool and sexy to buy certain products and demanding the boys be treated to the same baby-making side-effects as the girls. At some point we as a society must learn and emphasize that men have as much responsibility as do women for the children they produce, and on a day-to-day basis, not just when custody battles arise and the money is being counted.
The continuation of this analysis would go into society’s insistence women make less money, then considering the father’s larger income when contemplating custody - thus insuring money is the focus of child-rearing… perhaps to insure money is spent on junk that emphasizes sexiness and keeps the nasty spiral going?
Money talks, but it needs to learn another language. The status quo is too mean.
Chicago-born Kate Lehman Landishaw moved to SC from Boston, where she had spent many years as a grassroots activist (affordable housing and racism issues) while working to build a business career. When the obvious conflict of these pursuits finally dawned on her, social activism and her undeveloped talent as an artist emerged strongest; so, that’s where life is carving Kate’s niche in the Carolina clay.
We need to Tell Them, both boys and girls, that having sex isn’t finding love. This is difficult to understand, given the way romance is portrayed in movies and on TV, of course. This relates to my second message: We need to make sure we purchase NOTHING that uses sex to sell. It’s a cheap, ugly ploy by advertisers that if you use a given toothpaste or drive a certain car, you’re sexy. This, of course, furthers the concept that being sexy is a necessary ingredient to the glamour of living in a TV commercial, which we’re all taught is the way to live, just by the constant barrage of those very commercials! It’s a dangerous mind-warping fact of life for too many Americans, especially in places like South Carolina, where’s there’s virtually nothing to do that doesn’t involve spending money. Few people in SC have money. So many kids find comfort and fun in sex.
Girls bear the brunt of all this social irresponsibility. Perhaps if we could find a way for boys to suffer life-debilitating consequences of teenage pregnancy, they’d be more careful about playing around with sex - and perhaps their parents would begin to understand the need for sex education and condoms. As long as boys can go play their sports and pretty much suffer no consequences of getting girls pregnant, there will be no change in teen pregnancy rates. Classes that dwell on shame and fear will have no effect on teenagers, given teenagers’ tendency to believe nothing bad can happen to them! The only way we’ll see changes will be to change the adult contribution to society.
To sum up, that change must come from not supporting corporations who make it cool and sexy to buy certain products and demanding the boys be treated to the same baby-making side-effects as the girls. At some point we as a society must learn and emphasize that men have as much responsibility as do women for the children they produce, and on a day-to-day basis, not just when custody battles arise and the money is being counted.
The continuation of this analysis would go into society’s insistence women make less money, then considering the father’s larger income when contemplating custody - thus insuring money is the focus of child-rearing… perhaps to insure money is spent on junk that emphasizes sexiness and keeps the nasty spiral going?
Money talks, but it needs to learn another language. The status quo is too mean.
Chicago-born Kate Lehman Landishaw moved to SC from Boston, where she had spent many years as a grassroots activist (affordable housing and racism issues) while working to build a business career. When the obvious conflict of these pursuits finally dawned on her, social activism and her undeveloped talent as an artist emerged strongest; so, that’s where life is carving Kate’s niche in the Carolina clay.
September 16, 2007
Upstate Group Partners with Clemson University
A group has formed in the Clemson Area (Anderson, Pickens, and Oconee counties) to establish a network of people interested in reproductive health and reproductive freedom. Calling itself “Upstate Friends of Reproductive Choices”, it is affiliated with Planned Parenthood. Activities planned for this year include a TellThem! Advocacy 101 Workshop (Tuesday, November 13 at 7 p.m. at the Clemson UU Fellowship) and a series of community forums.
Working with Clemson University’s Women’s Studies Program, the group will present three forums during the academic year. The series is called Sex in the 21st Century. The kick-off program will be held on Wednesday, October 24th in the Strom Thurmond Institute, Clemson University at 7 PM.
The October forum, “Reproductive Choice: Past, Present, and Future”, will delve into the history of reproductive choice and project future choices for today’s men and women. The second forum on January 29th, “Secrets & Myths: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sexuality and Reproduction,” will replace widely held myths and misconceptions with truths and accuracies. The series will conclude on April 2nd with “Finding Common Ground on Birth Control and Abortion: A Religious and Ethical Perspective.” In this program, the controversial issues of birth control and abortion will be discussed from theological, philosophical, and ethical perspectives with the goal of discovering aspects of these issues that unite us.
If you are interested in becoming involved with Upstate Friends of Reproductive Choices, call the current co-chair: Janie Shipley at 864-885-1967 or Ellie Taylor at 864-654-1331.
A group has formed in the Clemson Area (Anderson, Pickens, and Oconee counties) to establish a network of people interested in reproductive health and reproductive freedom. Calling itself “Upstate Friends of Reproductive Choices”, it is affiliated with Planned Parenthood. Activities planned for this year include a TellThem! Advocacy 101 Workshop (Tuesday, November 13 at 7 p.m. at the Clemson UU Fellowship) and a series of community forums.
Working with Clemson University’s Women’s Studies Program, the group will present three forums during the academic year. The series is called Sex in the 21st Century. The kick-off program will be held on Wednesday, October 24th in the Strom Thurmond Institute, Clemson University at 7 PM.
The October forum, “Reproductive Choice: Past, Present, and Future”, will delve into the history of reproductive choice and project future choices for today’s men and women. The second forum on January 29th, “Secrets & Myths: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sexuality and Reproduction,” will replace widely held myths and misconceptions with truths and accuracies. The series will conclude on April 2nd with “Finding Common Ground on Birth Control and Abortion: A Religious and Ethical Perspective.” In this program, the controversial issues of birth control and abortion will be discussed from theological, philosophical, and ethical perspectives with the goal of discovering aspects of these issues that unite us.
If you are interested in becoming involved with Upstate Friends of Reproductive Choices, call the current co-chair: Janie Shipley at 864-885-1967 or Ellie Taylor at 864-654-1331.
September 16, 2007
Teaching Prevention is Key
South Carolina has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the nation. Every day, 30 teen-
aged girls become pregnant in South Carolina.
Teen mothers are more likely to experience complications with pregnancy, drop out of school and live in poverty. The children of these mothers are more likely to be incarcerated, experience abuse and neglect and to enter foster care. Their daughters are likely to repeat the cycle. And of course we cannot forget the taxpayers who foot the bill of $643,000 per year.
What disturbs me the most about these facts is that the majority of these teen pregnancies that occur on a daily basis are unwanted. The solution is simple: PREVENTION. Teaching prevention in schools and at home along with ensuring that contraceptives are available and affordable to all women, despite age, economic status, or race is the only way to stop this vicious cycle.
Unfortunately, many South Carolinians do not agree with this approach. While some are staunch in their ways that we should teach abstinence-only to our youth, the majority are simply uneducated about what works. That’s why we must come together and tell anyone who will listen why access to and education about reproductive health is so important. Educate your neighbors, your friends and your colleagues. I believe that with education, we can change and shape the future for thousands of youth across our state.
Born and raised in Columbia, Kate Hampton received a B.A. in journalism and Mass Communications from the University of South Carolina. Kate is the South Carolina Field Coordinator for Planned Parenthood Health Systems. She serves on the board of the League of Women Voters and also co-chairs the Legislative Committee for the NOW organization.
South Carolina has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the nation. Every day, 30 teen-
aged girls become pregnant in South Carolina.
Teen mothers are more likely to experience complications with pregnancy, drop out of school and live in poverty. The children of these mothers are more likely to be incarcerated, experience abuse and neglect and to enter foster care. Their daughters are likely to repeat the cycle. And of course we cannot forget the taxpayers who foot the bill of $643,000 per year.
What disturbs me the most about these facts is that the majority of these teen pregnancies that occur on a daily basis are unwanted. The solution is simple: PREVENTION. Teaching prevention in schools and at home along with ensuring that contraceptives are available and affordable to all women, despite age, economic status, or race is the only way to stop this vicious cycle.
Unfortunately, many South Carolinians do not agree with this approach. While some are staunch in their ways that we should teach abstinence-only to our youth, the majority are simply uneducated about what works. That’s why we must come together and tell anyone who will listen why access to and education about reproductive health is so important. Educate your neighbors, your friends and your colleagues. I believe that with education, we can change and shape the future for thousands of youth across our state.
Born and raised in Columbia, Kate Hampton received a B.A. in journalism and Mass Communications from the University of South Carolina. Kate is the South Carolina Field Coordinator for Planned Parenthood Health Systems. She serves on the board of the League of Women Voters and also co-chairs the Legislative Committee for the NOW organization.
September 11, 2007
Reducing Teen Pregnancy Rates
Good progress has been made in reducing teen pregnancy rates in the South Carolina and the rest of the United States in the past fifteen years, but much more needs to be done. The US still has the highest teen pregnancy rates of all the developed counties, and of the one million teens that become pregnant each year, only one-fourth will be married.
In my work as a child and adolescent therapist for the SC Department of Mental Health, I attempted to get the boys and girls that I worked with to understand the effects becoming a teen parent would have on the rest of their lives. Twenty-five percent of all teen moms will eventually end up on welfare and will face systemic poverty, because getting pregnant during your teens years usually means not completing your high school education. Without a high school diploma, or GED, it is difficult to obtain a good paying job that will allow you to support yourself and your family. The single most important indicator of future earnings is the number of years of education.The basic rules for having a successful life are as follows:
• Get all the education you possibly can• Do not become a parent until you are married• Do not get married until you have a good education
The keys to further reductions in the teen birth rate are an expanded comprehensive sex education program in our middle and high schools and increased access to family planning information and methods. Although comprehensive sex education is part of the mandated health education program in South Carolina schools, many school districts have not implemented the program because of a shortage of funding or teaching resources.
Because of the emphasis in many teen pregnancy preventions programs of educating females on the issue and solutions, men’s programs on the same subject do not carry the same emphasis on personal responsibility for out-of-wedlock pregnancies as the girl’s programs do.
If we are to continue to reduce teen pregnancies and out of wedlock births, we must find new ways to communicate to teenage boys and men their responsibility in making every child a wanted child. The second part of this aspect is to begin to hold the fathers of the out of wedlock births financially responsible and to involve them in the child’s life. We cannot continue to allow teenage boys and men to simply walk away from their financial and emotional responsibilities if our goal is to continue reducing teen pregnancies. This goal will be the most difficult to achieve because of the long historical and cultural traditions that link the concept of manhood to simply producing numbers of children without any consideration for the quality of life and future opportunities for the children.
Successful model sex and health education programs in countries like The Netherlands should be adopted in the United States if we are truly dedicated to reducing the teen pregnancy rate by another twenty-five or thirty percent. Unfortunately, our political, educational and social environments will not allow the adoption of these successful programs anytime in the near future.
Duane Bates worked as a therapist for the SC Department of Mental Health. He is retired, but currently volunteers for the United Way HELPline and as Controller for the Taylors Free Medical Clinic. He can be reached at bateduane@yahoo.com.
Good progress has been made in reducing teen pregnancy rates in the South Carolina and the rest of the United States in the past fifteen years, but much more needs to be done. The US still has the highest teen pregnancy rates of all the developed counties, and of the one million teens that become pregnant each year, only one-fourth will be married.
In my work as a child and adolescent therapist for the SC Department of Mental Health, I attempted to get the boys and girls that I worked with to understand the effects becoming a teen parent would have on the rest of their lives. Twenty-five percent of all teen moms will eventually end up on welfare and will face systemic poverty, because getting pregnant during your teens years usually means not completing your high school education. Without a high school diploma, or GED, it is difficult to obtain a good paying job that will allow you to support yourself and your family. The single most important indicator of future earnings is the number of years of education.The basic rules for having a successful life are as follows:
• Get all the education you possibly can• Do not become a parent until you are married• Do not get married until you have a good education
The keys to further reductions in the teen birth rate are an expanded comprehensive sex education program in our middle and high schools and increased access to family planning information and methods. Although comprehensive sex education is part of the mandated health education program in South Carolina schools, many school districts have not implemented the program because of a shortage of funding or teaching resources.
Because of the emphasis in many teen pregnancy preventions programs of educating females on the issue and solutions, men’s programs on the same subject do not carry the same emphasis on personal responsibility for out-of-wedlock pregnancies as the girl’s programs do.
If we are to continue to reduce teen pregnancies and out of wedlock births, we must find new ways to communicate to teenage boys and men their responsibility in making every child a wanted child. The second part of this aspect is to begin to hold the fathers of the out of wedlock births financially responsible and to involve them in the child’s life. We cannot continue to allow teenage boys and men to simply walk away from their financial and emotional responsibilities if our goal is to continue reducing teen pregnancies. This goal will be the most difficult to achieve because of the long historical and cultural traditions that link the concept of manhood to simply producing numbers of children without any consideration for the quality of life and future opportunities for the children.
Successful model sex and health education programs in countries like The Netherlands should be adopted in the United States if we are truly dedicated to reducing the teen pregnancy rate by another twenty-five or thirty percent. Unfortunately, our political, educational and social environments will not allow the adoption of these successful programs anytime in the near future.
Duane Bates worked as a therapist for the SC Department of Mental Health. He is retired, but currently volunteers for the United Way HELPline and as Controller for the Taylors Free Medical Clinic. He can be reached at bateduane@yahoo.com.
September 7, 2007
South Carolina EC Survey Results
Biannually, the University of South Carolina’s Institute for Public Service and Policy Research conducts the South Carolina State Survey. The survey is a cost-shared random probability survey that allows policy makers, researchers, and other interested organizations, such as the New Morning Foundation, gather reliable data about South Carolina citizens. The questions are pre-tested, and the respondents to be interviewed for the survey are selected from random samples of households with telephones in SC. To avoid biasing the sample in favor of households that can be reached by multiple phone numbers, each is case is weighted inversely to its probability of being included in the sample (Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, 2007).
New Morning Foundation submitted several questions related to emergency contraception (Plan B). Below are some general results. The Spring 2007 summary report also includes results by specific demographic characteristics (sex, race, age, education, income, type of area, region, and registered to vote).
1) Pharmacist has the right to refuse to fill a prescription:Yes - 24.7No - 60.4Not Sure - 14.9
Summary: Slightly more than 60% of South Carolinians believe that pharmacists do not have the right to refuse to fill a valid doctor’s prescription for emergency contraception if doing so goes against their personal beliefs.
2) Heard of various types of emergency contraception:the morning after pill Yes - 85.7No - 14.0DK - .3emergency birth control pillsYes - 51.6No - 47.2DK - 1.2emergency contraceptionYes - 40.3No - 57.3DK - 2.4Plan BYes - 25.3No - 72.3DK - 2.4
Summary: More than 85% have heard of the morning after pill, 51.6% have heard of emergency birth control pills, 40.3% have heard of emergency contraception, and only 25.3% have heard of Plan B.
3) Women can use Plan B to prevent pregnancy after unprotected intercourse.True - 39.9False - 8.1Not Sure - 52.0
Summary: A majority of respondents were not sure whether or not a woman can use Plan B to prevent pregnancy after unprotected intercourse.
For more information about emergency contraception, visit the South Carolina Emergency Contraception Initiative’s website.
Source: University of South Carolina’s Institute for Public Service and Policy Research: South Carolina State Survey Spring 2007 Summary Findings for the New Morning Foundation
Biannually, the University of South Carolina’s Institute for Public Service and Policy Research conducts the South Carolina State Survey. The survey is a cost-shared random probability survey that allows policy makers, researchers, and other interested organizations, such as the New Morning Foundation, gather reliable data about South Carolina citizens. The questions are pre-tested, and the respondents to be interviewed for the survey are selected from random samples of households with telephones in SC. To avoid biasing the sample in favor of households that can be reached by multiple phone numbers, each is case is weighted inversely to its probability of being included in the sample (Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, 2007).
New Morning Foundation submitted several questions related to emergency contraception (Plan B). Below are some general results. The Spring 2007 summary report also includes results by specific demographic characteristics (sex, race, age, education, income, type of area, region, and registered to vote).
1) Pharmacist has the right to refuse to fill a prescription:Yes - 24.7No - 60.4Not Sure - 14.9
Summary: Slightly more than 60% of South Carolinians believe that pharmacists do not have the right to refuse to fill a valid doctor’s prescription for emergency contraception if doing so goes against their personal beliefs.
2) Heard of various types of emergency contraception:the morning after pill Yes - 85.7No - 14.0DK - .3emergency birth control pillsYes - 51.6No - 47.2DK - 1.2emergency contraceptionYes - 40.3No - 57.3DK - 2.4Plan BYes - 25.3No - 72.3DK - 2.4
Summary: More than 85% have heard of the morning after pill, 51.6% have heard of emergency birth control pills, 40.3% have heard of emergency contraception, and only 25.3% have heard of Plan B.
3) Women can use Plan B to prevent pregnancy after unprotected intercourse.True - 39.9False - 8.1Not Sure - 52.0
Summary: A majority of respondents were not sure whether or not a woman can use Plan B to prevent pregnancy after unprotected intercourse.
For more information about emergency contraception, visit the South Carolina Emergency Contraception Initiative’s website.
Source: University of South Carolina’s Institute for Public Service and Policy Research: South Carolina State Survey Spring 2007 Summary Findings for the New Morning Foundation
September 5, 2007
Heritage Keepers Failing South Carolina Youth
SIECUS posted the following press release today:
A study released last week by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. conducted for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows once again that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs—no matter how intensive—are not effective. Students who attended a basic abstinence-only-until-marriage course and met weekly throughout the year to reinforce their abstinence training showed no difference in rates of abstinence, number of sexual partners, age of first sex, reported STDs, or reported pregnancies when compared to students who attended just the basic abstinence course.
“I can’t say that it’s surprising that students in the extended abstinence-only-until-marriage program didn’t change their behavior,” said Joseph DiNorcia, Jr., president of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), “More of nothing is still nothing.”
The newest study, which examined the program Heritage Keepers run by Heritage Community Services of South Carolina, compares students who took part in the mandatory abstinence-only-until-marriage programs with students who took part in the mandatory programs as well as the elective “Life Skills Education Component,” which met weekly for 45 minutes per session. SIECUS’ reviews of curricula produced by Heritage found them to be based on messages of fear and shame and to include biased views on gender, marriage, and pregnancy options. The often- controversial Heritage Community Services received a whopping $1,232,780 of federal funding in Fiscal Year 2006.
“There’s only so much you can learn by comparing a failed program with an expanded version of that same failed program. Still, this study has some disturbing results. For one thing it found that more than a third of the students involved in the Heritage programs think condoms, even when properly used, never prevent HIV. This kind of lack of knowledge is unforgivable,” DiNorcia said.
An earlier study by Mathematica, released in April, looked at four federally funded programs in diverse communities across the country and found no evidence that abstinence-only programs increased rates of sexual abstinence when students were compared to their peers who did not attend the programs. In fact, students in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs had a similar number of sexual partners as their peers not in the programs, as well as a similar age of first sex.
“The evidence is overwhelming —abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are failing our young people. It’s time we stop pouring taxpayer money into them and start funding more comprehensive sexuality education programs,” DiNorcia concluded.
To view the full report, click here. To view the SIECUS state profile for South Carolina in its entirety or to learn more about Heritage Community Services, click here.
Have questions or need information, contact Patrick Malone at pmalone@siecus.org or (212) 819-9770 ext. 316.
SIECUS posted the following press release today:
A study released last week by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. conducted for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows once again that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs—no matter how intensive—are not effective. Students who attended a basic abstinence-only-until-marriage course and met weekly throughout the year to reinforce their abstinence training showed no difference in rates of abstinence, number of sexual partners, age of first sex, reported STDs, or reported pregnancies when compared to students who attended just the basic abstinence course.
“I can’t say that it’s surprising that students in the extended abstinence-only-until-marriage program didn’t change their behavior,” said Joseph DiNorcia, Jr., president of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), “More of nothing is still nothing.”
The newest study, which examined the program Heritage Keepers run by Heritage Community Services of South Carolina, compares students who took part in the mandatory abstinence-only-until-marriage programs with students who took part in the mandatory programs as well as the elective “Life Skills Education Component,” which met weekly for 45 minutes per session. SIECUS’ reviews of curricula produced by Heritage found them to be based on messages of fear and shame and to include biased views on gender, marriage, and pregnancy options. The often- controversial Heritage Community Services received a whopping $1,232,780 of federal funding in Fiscal Year 2006.
“There’s only so much you can learn by comparing a failed program with an expanded version of that same failed program. Still, this study has some disturbing results. For one thing it found that more than a third of the students involved in the Heritage programs think condoms, even when properly used, never prevent HIV. This kind of lack of knowledge is unforgivable,” DiNorcia said.
An earlier study by Mathematica, released in April, looked at four federally funded programs in diverse communities across the country and found no evidence that abstinence-only programs increased rates of sexual abstinence when students were compared to their peers who did not attend the programs. In fact, students in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs had a similar number of sexual partners as their peers not in the programs, as well as a similar age of first sex.
“The evidence is overwhelming —abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are failing our young people. It’s time we stop pouring taxpayer money into them and start funding more comprehensive sexuality education programs,” DiNorcia concluded.
To view the full report, click here. To view the SIECUS state profile for South Carolina in its entirety or to learn more about Heritage Community Services, click here.
Have questions or need information, contact Patrick Malone at pmalone@siecus.org or (212) 819-9770 ext. 316.
August 31, 2007
Beaufort House Candidates Discuss Reproductive Health
The day after Labor Day, September 4th, Beaufort will hold a special election for House District 124 to fill former State Representative Catherine Ceips (R-Beaufort) seat. Ms. Ceips was recently elected to the State Senate to complete the terms of Scott Richardson [R]. She now holds a seat in the state Senate for District 46 - Beaufort County. There are three Republican candidates running: Randy Bates, Shannon Erickson, & Diane DeWitt. Candidate information can be found here.
On August 29th, The Beaufort Regional Chamber’s Candidates Forum took place with more than 100 persons in attendance. The event was hosted by the Beaufort Gazette, Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce, Lady’s Island Business and Professional Association and Lowcountry Young Professionals. Prior to the Forum, questions were submitted by some members of the Together for Beaufort Teenage Pregnancy Committee regarding young peoples’ reproductive health.
Lisa Rentz, a TellThem! member, reported:
“After realizing that some of the questions pre-submitted by email would not be used, I decided to write-in a question: “Healthcare is a national problem, and STDs and teen pregnancy rates in SC are high. How would you improve access to health care and birth control?”
Each candidate’s answer focused on teen pregnancy and education in the schools. Diane DeWitt also mentioned improving healthcare in her closing remarks.
The next question asked was: “How would you have voted on the ultrasound bill: pro-choice or pro-life?”
Diane DeWitt and Shannon Erickson both clearly replied they would not have voted for it, it was only to intimidate women. Ms. Erickson went as far as to say something like even though she’s pro-life and catholic, everybody can have their own ideals. Randy Bates spent his minute talking about being pro-life.”
Related Links:
Beaufort Gazette Political Pulse on the candidates
Live blogger at the event
As a 501C3 non-profit organization, we do not endorse any candidates. However, we do educate constituents about candidate’s views on the issue of reproductive health.
The day after Labor Day, September 4th, Beaufort will hold a special election for House District 124 to fill former State Representative Catherine Ceips (R-Beaufort) seat. Ms. Ceips was recently elected to the State Senate to complete the terms of Scott Richardson [R]. She now holds a seat in the state Senate for District 46 - Beaufort County. There are three Republican candidates running: Randy Bates, Shannon Erickson, & Diane DeWitt. Candidate information can be found here.
On August 29th, The Beaufort Regional Chamber’s Candidates Forum took place with more than 100 persons in attendance. The event was hosted by the Beaufort Gazette, Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce, Lady’s Island Business and Professional Association and Lowcountry Young Professionals. Prior to the Forum, questions were submitted by some members of the Together for Beaufort Teenage Pregnancy Committee regarding young peoples’ reproductive health.
Lisa Rentz, a TellThem! member, reported:
“After realizing that some of the questions pre-submitted by email would not be used, I decided to write-in a question: “Healthcare is a national problem, and STDs and teen pregnancy rates in SC are high. How would you improve access to health care and birth control?”
Each candidate’s answer focused on teen pregnancy and education in the schools. Diane DeWitt also mentioned improving healthcare in her closing remarks.
The next question asked was: “How would you have voted on the ultrasound bill: pro-choice or pro-life?”
Diane DeWitt and Shannon Erickson both clearly replied they would not have voted for it, it was only to intimidate women. Ms. Erickson went as far as to say something like even though she’s pro-life and catholic, everybody can have their own ideals. Randy Bates spent his minute talking about being pro-life.”
Related Links:
Beaufort Gazette Political Pulse on the candidates
Live blogger at the event
As a 501C3 non-profit organization, we do not endorse any candidates. However, we do educate constituents about candidate’s views on the issue of reproductive health.
August 29, 2007
Birth Control Costs Increase at College Health Centers
The Deficit Reduction Act, signed into law on February 8, 2006, includes a provision that adversely affects the ability of health centers to purchase contraceptives at a discounted or nominal price. The provision went into effect on January 1, 2007.
Policy makers in Congress have since acknowledged the error and have been working to find a vehicle to attach a no-cost, technical correction. At TellThem!, we have been following this issue and will be working with national partners to make sure that South Carolina college students have all the access they need to family planning services.
Reproductive health is so important for all of our SC college students. The facts are that:
- 1 out of every four women experience unwanted sexual intercourse while attending college (Indiana University)- At least 69% of females and 64% of males have had sexual intercourse at age 18-19 (CDC)- Over half (54%) of all unwanted pregnancies occur to women in their twenties (National Campaign)- Between 20-25% of college students have either been infected with an STD or have transmitted one to their sexual partners (Go Ask Alice)
The Charleston Post and Courier printed this wonderful letter to the editor regarding this issue today.
Contraception costs
The increase in birth control costs on college campuses is going to hit home with students at the University of South Carolina and Clemson University.
As a college student, I could not imagine adding any additional costs to my already limited budget. The price increase will likely lead to an increase in students not using protection.
It shouldn’t have to be this way. In the Deficit Reduction Act, which went into effect in January, Congress inadvertently changed a rule and made it harder for universities and some family-planning providers to provide their patients with affordable birth control. This is a simple problem for Congress to fix — it will cost the government nothing and can be done immediately.
Students shouldn’t have to jump through hoops just to practice safer sex, especially when the fix is so easy. Congress should be making it easier, not harder, for women to have access to affordable contraception.
BROOKE SPIVEY
The Box Organization
College of Charleston
66 George St.
The Deficit Reduction Act, signed into law on February 8, 2006, includes a provision that adversely affects the ability of health centers to purchase contraceptives at a discounted or nominal price. The provision went into effect on January 1, 2007.
Policy makers in Congress have since acknowledged the error and have been working to find a vehicle to attach a no-cost, technical correction. At TellThem!, we have been following this issue and will be working with national partners to make sure that South Carolina college students have all the access they need to family planning services.
Reproductive health is so important for all of our SC college students. The facts are that:
- 1 out of every four women experience unwanted sexual intercourse while attending college (Indiana University)- At least 69% of females and 64% of males have had sexual intercourse at age 18-19 (CDC)- Over half (54%) of all unwanted pregnancies occur to women in their twenties (National Campaign)- Between 20-25% of college students have either been infected with an STD or have transmitted one to their sexual partners (Go Ask Alice)
The Charleston Post and Courier printed this wonderful letter to the editor regarding this issue today.
Contraception costs
The increase in birth control costs on college campuses is going to hit home with students at the University of South Carolina and Clemson University.
As a college student, I could not imagine adding any additional costs to my already limited budget. The price increase will likely lead to an increase in students not using protection.
It shouldn’t have to be this way. In the Deficit Reduction Act, which went into effect in January, Congress inadvertently changed a rule and made it harder for universities and some family-planning providers to provide their patients with affordable birth control. This is a simple problem for Congress to fix — it will cost the government nothing and can be done immediately.
Students shouldn’t have to jump through hoops just to practice safer sex, especially when the fix is so easy. Congress should be making it easier, not harder, for women to have access to affordable contraception.
BROOKE SPIVEY
The Box Organization
College of Charleston
66 George St.
August 27, 2007
Why I think abstinence only education stinks
Amy Holleman chairs the Young Feminist Committee for SC NOW. She is a volunteer advocate for Sexual Trauma Services of the Midlands, and she also works with groups like RESULTS and the South Carolina Campaign to End AIDS. Amy was recently featured in Skirt! Magazine’s Feminist Issue for the Columbia market.
In a perfect world, or at least a perfect America, kids probably wouldn’t have sex very early, especially not at 11, 12, or 13 years old. In a perfect America, teenagers would know all of the risks associated with sex, how to protect themselves, and would probably wait until they were ready before engaging in sexual activity. Unfortunately, this place isn’t perfect; therefore, I believe we should educate kids and give them the information they need to make the most informed decisions possible regarding their bodies. Teaching kids about sex won’t cause them have sex any earlier or later, but it could save their lives.
We were all teenagers once. We all know what it’s like to feel the hormones rage and feel the pressure from our friends to have sex. Abstinence only education may seem like a sensible fix for things like teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and it would be if it worked. The truth is, you cannot cure all sexually transmitted infections. Herpes is forever. Certain strains of HPV can cause cervical cancer. HIV can lead to AIDS. Syphilis, left untreated, can cause significant brain damage. Not teaching kids how to protect themselves about these things can kill them. I’m not a parent, but I think if I were, while I may be terribly upset to learn my child was having sex too young, I would rather have my child safer than not.
Thinking back on a conversation I had with some teenagers from a local high school at a young feminists sleepover that a former head of Columbia, SC NOW hosted, I am painfully aware of the misinformation circulating amongst them. Things I was shock to “learn” from these girls (ages 14-17) included, but were not limited to, such things as the following:
- If you have sex but douche immediately afterwards with a regular soda, it will keep you from getting pregnant and will wash away any diseases that you may have contracted (crazy me, I can only imagine that leading to a raging yeast infection).- You can look at a person and tell if they are HIV positive.- You cannot get AIDS or other sexually transmitted diseases from anal sex or oral sex. Neither oral sex nor anal sex are sex; therefore, as long as you are not engaging in plain ol’ heterosexual vaginal intercourse, you are engaging in an abstinent lifestyle.- If boys drink a 2-liter Mountain Dew a day for a month, they will be sterile for five (5) years so do not need to use condoms.- Condoms are only for gay men who have sex with strangers at bars.- You have to be 21 to buy condoms.- It is wrong for a girl to ask her boyfriend to use a condom.- It isn’t rape if it is anal sex, and he is your boyfriend, even if you said no.
The list goes on and on, but I think you guys get the point. Those kids, by the way, were from various backgrounds and socioeconomic situations. The things I learned from those girls are prime examples of why abstinence only education is failing our children.
Amy Holleman chairs the Young Feminist Committee for SC NOW. She is a volunteer advocate for Sexual Trauma Services of the Midlands, and she also works with groups like RESULTS and the South Carolina Campaign to End AIDS. Amy was recently featured in Skirt! Magazine’s Feminist Issue for the Columbia market.
In a perfect world, or at least a perfect America, kids probably wouldn’t have sex very early, especially not at 11, 12, or 13 years old. In a perfect America, teenagers would know all of the risks associated with sex, how to protect themselves, and would probably wait until they were ready before engaging in sexual activity. Unfortunately, this place isn’t perfect; therefore, I believe we should educate kids and give them the information they need to make the most informed decisions possible regarding their bodies. Teaching kids about sex won’t cause them have sex any earlier or later, but it could save their lives.
We were all teenagers once. We all know what it’s like to feel the hormones rage and feel the pressure from our friends to have sex. Abstinence only education may seem like a sensible fix for things like teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and it would be if it worked. The truth is, you cannot cure all sexually transmitted infections. Herpes is forever. Certain strains of HPV can cause cervical cancer. HIV can lead to AIDS. Syphilis, left untreated, can cause significant brain damage. Not teaching kids how to protect themselves about these things can kill them. I’m not a parent, but I think if I were, while I may be terribly upset to learn my child was having sex too young, I would rather have my child safer than not.
Thinking back on a conversation I had with some teenagers from a local high school at a young feminists sleepover that a former head of Columbia, SC NOW hosted, I am painfully aware of the misinformation circulating amongst them. Things I was shock to “learn” from these girls (ages 14-17) included, but were not limited to, such things as the following:
- If you have sex but douche immediately afterwards with a regular soda, it will keep you from getting pregnant and will wash away any diseases that you may have contracted (crazy me, I can only imagine that leading to a raging yeast infection).- You can look at a person and tell if they are HIV positive.- You cannot get AIDS or other sexually transmitted diseases from anal sex or oral sex. Neither oral sex nor anal sex are sex; therefore, as long as you are not engaging in plain ol’ heterosexual vaginal intercourse, you are engaging in an abstinent lifestyle.- If boys drink a 2-liter Mountain Dew a day for a month, they will be sterile for five (5) years so do not need to use condoms.- Condoms are only for gay men who have sex with strangers at bars.- You have to be 21 to buy condoms.- It is wrong for a girl to ask her boyfriend to use a condom.- It isn’t rape if it is anal sex, and he is your boyfriend, even if you said no.
The list goes on and on, but I think you guys get the point. Those kids, by the way, were from various backgrounds and socioeconomic situations. The things I learned from those girls are prime examples of why abstinence only education is failing our children.
August 16, 2007
Abstinence just part of effective programs
This great letter to the editor was published in The State on Monday by Forrest Alton, Executive Director of the SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Abstinence just part of effective programs
A July 29 headline proclaimed, “Abstinence-only sex education questioned.” But while the jury was out for some time on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, there is no longer a question: A large-scale, well-designed, federally funded evaluation has shown that they do not work.
Abstinence is clearly the first and best choice for young people and should be emphasized.
But there is a clear distinction between abstinence as a behavior and abstinence-only as an educational approach. While abstinence-only programs have been shown to be ineffective, there are a variety of programs that research has shown to be effective. A commonality of the programs that work is a clear and consistent message that abstinence is the first and best choice combined with age-appropriate, medically accurate information and condoms and contraception for those youth who are sexually active. This comprehensive approach has been shown through rigorous research to delay the initiation of sex, increase the use of contraception and ultimately decrease rates of pregnancy and STDs.
A 2007 survey showed that 81 percent of S.C. adults agree that sexuality education that emphasizes abstinence as the first, best option but also teaches the importance of contraception should be taught in the public schools.
As future decisions about funding are made, let’s hope the results of sound research and the views of an overwhelming majority of South Carolinians are considered. There is no time to continue funding approaches to sex education that do not work.
The mission of the South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy is to prevent adolescent pregnancy in South Carolina through education, advocacy, technical assistance, public awareness and research.
This great letter to the editor was published in The State on Monday by Forrest Alton, Executive Director of the SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Abstinence just part of effective programs
A July 29 headline proclaimed, “Abstinence-only sex education questioned.” But while the jury was out for some time on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, there is no longer a question: A large-scale, well-designed, federally funded evaluation has shown that they do not work.
Abstinence is clearly the first and best choice for young people and should be emphasized.
But there is a clear distinction between abstinence as a behavior and abstinence-only as an educational approach. While abstinence-only programs have been shown to be ineffective, there are a variety of programs that research has shown to be effective. A commonality of the programs that work is a clear and consistent message that abstinence is the first and best choice combined with age-appropriate, medically accurate information and condoms and contraception for those youth who are sexually active. This comprehensive approach has been shown through rigorous research to delay the initiation of sex, increase the use of contraception and ultimately decrease rates of pregnancy and STDs.
A 2007 survey showed that 81 percent of S.C. adults agree that sexuality education that emphasizes abstinence as the first, best option but also teaches the importance of contraception should be taught in the public schools.
As future decisions about funding are made, let’s hope the results of sound research and the views of an overwhelming majority of South Carolinians are considered. There is no time to continue funding approaches to sex education that do not work.
The mission of the South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy is to prevent adolescent pregnancy in South Carolina through education, advocacy, technical assistance, public awareness and research.
August 15, 2007
Meeting with Rep. Clyburn's Area Director
In partnership with Advocates for Youth, a group of dynamic women who are all TellThem! members met with Dalton J. Tresvant, Midlands Area Director for federal House Representative James E. Clyburn. The meeting was scheduled to request that Rep. Clyburn 1) not support funding for abstinence-only programs and 2) support the abundant research that reveals that abstinence-only programs do not work and also provided information on funding for abstinence-only programs in our state. South Carolina received $3,341,101 in federal funds for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in Fiscal Year 2006 despite the fact that we know that 81% of South Carolina voters think that sex education in public schools should contain information on both abstinence and contraception. A large portion of this funding went to Heritage Community Services out of Charleston.
As both a constituent and the Program Manager for the SC Emergency Contraceptive Initiative, Lottie McClorin voiced how both through her teen experience in Williamsburg County and her work in the field as a health educator with the Initiative, she has seen a huge need for a more comprehensive approach to education. As a teen, she saw that most teens were getting their reproductive health information from the streets and not from the schools where they needed it. As a professional, she has seen how even health professionals do not know about emergency contraception and are not fully informed through out our state.
An avid volunteer for the SC Democratic headquarters and a retired nursing professor at USC, Opal Brown shared with Mr. Tresvant how HIV/AIDS had directly impacted her own personal family and the importance of comprehensive sexuality education for the health of our young people who are being devastated by STIs/STDS.
Finally, Bonnie Adams, Executive Director of the New Morning Foundation, shared information about the Foundation’s work in Rep. Clyburn’s 6th District. She also shared crucial information on the numbers of teen births in the District and the economic cost of these births.
Mr. Tresvant explained that Rep. Clyburn’s vote for abstinence-only was probably due to the fact that the abstinence-only funding piece was part of a larger appropriations bill that included funding for other positive programs for the community. As we all know, what happens up on Capitol Hill is all about compromise. We were, however, assured that the bill would probably come back to conference and that our views would be taken into consideration at that point. It was great to know the difference one meeting was able to make and that Rep. Clyburn was supportive of a more comprehensive approach.
Summer seems to be a great time to meet with legislators. For tips on doing so, visit our advocacy toolkit on members’ home.
In partnership with Advocates for Youth, a group of dynamic women who are all TellThem! members met with Dalton J. Tresvant, Midlands Area Director for federal House Representative James E. Clyburn. The meeting was scheduled to request that Rep. Clyburn 1) not support funding for abstinence-only programs and 2) support the abundant research that reveals that abstinence-only programs do not work and also provided information on funding for abstinence-only programs in our state. South Carolina received $3,341,101 in federal funds for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in Fiscal Year 2006 despite the fact that we know that 81% of South Carolina voters think that sex education in public schools should contain information on both abstinence and contraception. A large portion of this funding went to Heritage Community Services out of Charleston.
As both a constituent and the Program Manager for the SC Emergency Contraceptive Initiative, Lottie McClorin voiced how both through her teen experience in Williamsburg County and her work in the field as a health educator with the Initiative, she has seen a huge need for a more comprehensive approach to education. As a teen, she saw that most teens were getting their reproductive health information from the streets and not from the schools where they needed it. As a professional, she has seen how even health professionals do not know about emergency contraception and are not fully informed through out our state.
An avid volunteer for the SC Democratic headquarters and a retired nursing professor at USC, Opal Brown shared with Mr. Tresvant how HIV/AIDS had directly impacted her own personal family and the importance of comprehensive sexuality education for the health of our young people who are being devastated by STIs/STDS.
Finally, Bonnie Adams, Executive Director of the New Morning Foundation, shared information about the Foundation’s work in Rep. Clyburn’s 6th District. She also shared crucial information on the numbers of teen births in the District and the economic cost of these births.
Mr. Tresvant explained that Rep. Clyburn’s vote for abstinence-only was probably due to the fact that the abstinence-only funding piece was part of a larger appropriations bill that included funding for other positive programs for the community. As we all know, what happens up on Capitol Hill is all about compromise. We were, however, assured that the bill would probably come back to conference and that our views would be taken into consideration at that point. It was great to know the difference one meeting was able to make and that Rep. Clyburn was supportive of a more comprehensive approach.
Summer seems to be a great time to meet with legislators. For tips on doing so, visit our advocacy toolkit on members’ home.
August 10, 2007
Adolescents from Malawi to SC, the same
The Guttmacher Institute and nine partner organizations asked “more than 20,000 adolescents in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda to describe their lives, their worries, their sources of information about pregnancy and HIV prevention, and how they access health care services”.
They found that:
• Adolescents’ knowledge is broad but not deep. The vast majority of young people have heard about HIV, but many lack in-depth knowledge of how the disease is spread, which they need to protect themselves.
• Young people trust the formal sector. Overwhelmingly, young Africans said their preferred sources of information were doctors, nurses and teachers, and they wanted to receive health services from clinics and health centers. However, they also said a key reason why they did not seek care was that they were embarrassed and ashamed to do so; and we know that much more needs to be done to provide adequate and accessible services for young people.
• The very young are not naive. While most younger adolescents have not yet had sex, by the age of 15, nearly all are aware of it, some have sexually experienced friends and many have experimented with kissing and fondling. Many young adolescents said they want to learn about sex in schools, from sources they can trust.
The adolescents in Africa seem to have the same level of knowledge and needs as our own SC teens. Improving reproductive health education and awareness for our young people is so important. As Guttmacher stated in their press release today, “we should…listen to what young people are telling us. They look forward to brighter futures and want to stay safe from disease and early pregnancy. Let us honor their request by providing them the sexual and reproductive health information and services they need to live out their dreams and help build stronger societies.”
To read more about Guttmacher’s work with adolescents, click here.
The Guttmacher Institute and nine partner organizations asked “more than 20,000 adolescents in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda to describe their lives, their worries, their sources of information about pregnancy and HIV prevention, and how they access health care services”.
They found that:
• Adolescents’ knowledge is broad but not deep. The vast majority of young people have heard about HIV, but many lack in-depth knowledge of how the disease is spread, which they need to protect themselves.
• Young people trust the formal sector. Overwhelmingly, young Africans said their preferred sources of information were doctors, nurses and teachers, and they wanted to receive health services from clinics and health centers. However, they also said a key reason why they did not seek care was that they were embarrassed and ashamed to do so; and we know that much more needs to be done to provide adequate and accessible services for young people.
• The very young are not naive. While most younger adolescents have not yet had sex, by the age of 15, nearly all are aware of it, some have sexually experienced friends and many have experimented with kissing and fondling. Many young adolescents said they want to learn about sex in schools, from sources they can trust.
The adolescents in Africa seem to have the same level of knowledge and needs as our own SC teens. Improving reproductive health education and awareness for our young people is so important. As Guttmacher stated in their press release today, “we should…listen to what young people are telling us. They look forward to brighter futures and want to stay safe from disease and early pregnancy. Let us honor their request by providing them the sexual and reproductive health information and services they need to live out their dreams and help build stronger societies.”
To read more about Guttmacher’s work with adolescents, click here.
August 9, 2007
Reproductive Health in The State
Two great letters to the editor have been published in The State this week. Murray Vincent, Ed.D, nationally recognized for his successful Barnwell County Teen Pregnancy Prevention Council, was published on Saturday. His letter entitled “Comprehensive family planning key to better, healthier S.C.” stresses the importance of ensuring that community-based family planning programs and clinical services provided by DHEC be accessible to all South Carolinians. Today, Lanita Patterson, Planned Parenthood Healthy Systems’ state-wide health educator writes “Abstinence-only programs waste money”. The letter addresses the fact that “$800,000 is included in our state’s budget this year for abstinence-only programs” and stresses the importance of providing medically accurate information to our teens. It is wonderful to see the media covering these two important issues: reproductive health education and access.
A big thank you to Dr. Vincent & Ms. Patterson for writing these letters. We need more community advocates writing letters supporting teenage pregnancy prevention. For tips on doing so, please visit our members’ only media toolkit.
Two great letters to the editor have been published in The State this week. Murray Vincent, Ed.D, nationally recognized for his successful Barnwell County Teen Pregnancy Prevention Council, was published on Saturday. His letter entitled “Comprehensive family planning key to better, healthier S.C.” stresses the importance of ensuring that community-based family planning programs and clinical services provided by DHEC be accessible to all South Carolinians. Today, Lanita Patterson, Planned Parenthood Healthy Systems’ state-wide health educator writes “Abstinence-only programs waste money”. The letter addresses the fact that “$800,000 is included in our state’s budget this year for abstinence-only programs” and stresses the importance of providing medically accurate information to our teens. It is wonderful to see the media covering these two important issues: reproductive health education and access.
A big thank you to Dr. Vincent & Ms. Patterson for writing these letters. We need more community advocates writing letters supporting teenage pregnancy prevention. For tips on doing so, please visit our members’ only media toolkit.
August 8, 2007
National Views on Reauthorization
In this week’s newsletter, we linked to SIECUS’ view on the House of Representatives approving a bill that would reauthorize the Title V abstinence-only program with policy changes. Their press release seemed positive and supported that the policy changes would at least allow for some improvements:
1) Requiring funded programs to contain medically and scientifically accurate information;2) Giving states the flexibility to use funds for more comprehensive programs which discuss abstinence, but may also include information on birth control; and3) Requiring funded programs to have been proven effective at decreasing teen pregnancy, STD, and HIV/AIDS rates.
Advocates for Youth (AFY), another one of our national partners, has officially stated that they do not support these fixes for two reasons: First, the “fixes” leave A-H abstinence education intact. Second, any abstinence-plus program must still go through the Bush administration’s abstinence-only filter. AFY believes that the best approach to changing these programs is to amend the A-H definition into a comprehensive sex education definition. Failing that, they believe that Congress should let Title V expire.
President Bush has threatened to veto the House’s approval of the reauthorization. So, for now, we will wait and see as the debate continues.
In this week’s newsletter, we linked to SIECUS’ view on the House of Representatives approving a bill that would reauthorize the Title V abstinence-only program with policy changes. Their press release seemed positive and supported that the policy changes would at least allow for some improvements:
1) Requiring funded programs to contain medically and scientifically accurate information;2) Giving states the flexibility to use funds for more comprehensive programs which discuss abstinence, but may also include information on birth control; and3) Requiring funded programs to have been proven effective at decreasing teen pregnancy, STD, and HIV/AIDS rates.
Advocates for Youth (AFY), another one of our national partners, has officially stated that they do not support these fixes for two reasons: First, the “fixes” leave A-H abstinence education intact. Second, any abstinence-plus program must still go through the Bush administration’s abstinence-only filter. AFY believes that the best approach to changing these programs is to amend the A-H definition into a comprehensive sex education definition. Failing that, they believe that Congress should let Title V expire.
President Bush has threatened to veto the House’s approval of the reauthorization. So, for now, we will wait and see as the debate continues.
August 7, 2007
Legislative Training
Last Friday, advocates from across the state met for a legislative training. New Morning Foundation and the South Carolina Coalition for Healthy Families were co-sponsors along with Alliance for Full Acceptance, Carolina Peace Resource Center, Coalition for New South Carolinians, College of Charleston Women & Gender Studies, Gamma Sigma Alliance (Francis Marion University), League of Women Voters of South Carolina, People Against Rape, SCCADVASA, SC Equality Coalition, SC Log Cabin Republicans, South Carolina Progressive Network, and Young Democrats (SC Democratic Party).
The afternoon began with a tour of the statehouse grounds. If you haven’t had a chance to go on a tour, the video at the beginning is actually quite informative. Perhaps the most engaging part of the tour was the chance to see the African American History Monument, which is “dedicated to the people of South Carolina to recognize the many accomplishments and contributions of the African-American citizens to the State”.
The tour was followed with a panel discussion including Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, Rep. J. Seth Whipper, and Tanya Wallace (WAND National Field Director).
Tanya Wallance suggested these ideas for grassroots advocacy:- talk to your newspaper’s editorial board- write op-ed collectives- publish in community papers- host town hall meetings- participate in joint lobbying days- involve the teachers’ union on your coalition- conduct focus groups to find out how constituents feel
Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter and Rep. J. Seth Whipper suggested the dos and don’ts of working with state-level legislators:
Do:
- commit to the long haul (incremental change takes time)- know your issue- give it to them straight- be ready for shortcomings in your position- be clear about what makes the legislator listen- communicate quickly and succintly - make a message that lasts- be always willing to be nice- decide who is best suited to make the pitch- identify your human resources and take advantage of them- learn the legislative process- understand the calendar year and calendar of activities- make sure the media is a good resource for you- make friends with the receptionist
Do Not:
- make stuff up- get angry (assume he/she knows nothing about the issue)- take on every issue- lie (if you don’t know, say so)- send form letters- get confused about who you are or the legislator’s role(remind he/she that they serve the people)- take this stuff too serious
Last Friday, advocates from across the state met for a legislative training. New Morning Foundation and the South Carolina Coalition for Healthy Families were co-sponsors along with Alliance for Full Acceptance, Carolina Peace Resource Center, Coalition for New South Carolinians, College of Charleston Women & Gender Studies, Gamma Sigma Alliance (Francis Marion University), League of Women Voters of South Carolina, People Against Rape, SCCADVASA, SC Equality Coalition, SC Log Cabin Republicans, South Carolina Progressive Network, and Young Democrats (SC Democratic Party).
The afternoon began with a tour of the statehouse grounds. If you haven’t had a chance to go on a tour, the video at the beginning is actually quite informative. Perhaps the most engaging part of the tour was the chance to see the African American History Monument, which is “dedicated to the people of South Carolina to recognize the many accomplishments and contributions of the African-American citizens to the State”.
The tour was followed with a panel discussion including Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, Rep. J. Seth Whipper, and Tanya Wallace (WAND National Field Director).
Tanya Wallance suggested these ideas for grassroots advocacy:- talk to your newspaper’s editorial board- write op-ed collectives- publish in community papers- host town hall meetings- participate in joint lobbying days- involve the teachers’ union on your coalition- conduct focus groups to find out how constituents feel
Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter and Rep. J. Seth Whipper suggested the dos and don’ts of working with state-level legislators:
Do:
- commit to the long haul (incremental change takes time)- know your issue- give it to them straight- be ready for shortcomings in your position- be clear about what makes the legislator listen- communicate quickly and succintly - make a message that lasts- be always willing to be nice- decide who is best suited to make the pitch- identify your human resources and take advantage of them- learn the legislative process- understand the calendar year and calendar of activities- make sure the media is a good resource for you- make friends with the receptionist
Do Not:
- make stuff up- get angry (assume he/she knows nothing about the issue)- take on every issue- lie (if you don’t know, say so)- send form letters- get confused about who you are or the legislator’s role(remind he/she that they serve the people)- take this stuff too serious
August 6, 2007
Letters Make a Difference
Recently, Seneca’s Daily Journal published Plan B Prevents Pregnancy written by Don Downing, Consultant to the South Carolina Emergency Contraception Campaign.
To show support, one of our TellThem! members, Carol Fritze, wrote a letter to the editor, which was published! (Thank you Carol!) In it, she states that she hopes “it was read by those who need to know the difference between “Plan B” and RU-486″.
We couldn’t agree more. When we are out in the community, we find that a lot of individuals do not know the difference and think that Plan B is the same thing as RU-486, or the abortion pill. Plan B, a concentrated dose of the same hormones as regular birth control pills, is a medication that prevents pregnancy up to three days after unprotected or unwanted sex. It will not cause an abortion.
Carol’s great letter was followed by another by Dr. Gerald B. Holzman. Dr. Holzman responded to a July 6th letter written by Dr. Pirkle (Life begins at conception) by stating:
“It should be understood that Dr. Pirkle offered his opinion, not that of the scientific community. The mechanism probably does not interfere with implantation, and is currently not well understood. Furthermore, when life begins can be argued from an ethical, scientific, and religious standpoint and religious views have changed over the millenia. It would be prudent if Dr. Pirkle followed the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice in his statements to the press and his patients.”
We commend Dr. Holzman for explaining how EC works and taking the time, as a busy physician, to show support and to write. Letters to the editor can make a difference. If you would like tips on writing a letter to the editor, please check out our advocacy toolkit on members’ home.
Recently, Seneca’s Daily Journal published Plan B Prevents Pregnancy written by Don Downing, Consultant to the South Carolina Emergency Contraception Campaign.
To show support, one of our TellThem! members, Carol Fritze, wrote a letter to the editor, which was published! (Thank you Carol!) In it, she states that she hopes “it was read by those who need to know the difference between “Plan B” and RU-486″.
We couldn’t agree more. When we are out in the community, we find that a lot of individuals do not know the difference and think that Plan B is the same thing as RU-486, or the abortion pill. Plan B, a concentrated dose of the same hormones as regular birth control pills, is a medication that prevents pregnancy up to three days after unprotected or unwanted sex. It will not cause an abortion.
Carol’s great letter was followed by another by Dr. Gerald B. Holzman. Dr. Holzman responded to a July 6th letter written by Dr. Pirkle (Life begins at conception) by stating:
“It should be understood that Dr. Pirkle offered his opinion, not that of the scientific community. The mechanism probably does not interfere with implantation, and is currently not well understood. Furthermore, when life begins can be argued from an ethical, scientific, and religious standpoint and religious views have changed over the millenia. It would be prudent if Dr. Pirkle followed the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice in his statements to the press and his patients.”
We commend Dr. Holzman for explaining how EC works and taking the time, as a busy physician, to show support and to write. Letters to the editor can make a difference. If you would like tips on writing a letter to the editor, please check out our advocacy toolkit on members’ home.
August 3, 2007
Abstinence-only debate continues
The USA Today has published both an editorial againstabstinence-only education as well as an opposing piece supporting abstinence-only education.
Here are two quotes from the Kaiser Network:
Teaching abstinence has “always had a certain appeal,” but it is “not a time for wishful thinking” because recent studies have suggested that the “decline in the rate of teens having sex has plateaued” (USA Today, 7/30).
From USA Today: Our view on sex education: Abstinence-only fails to stop early pregnancies, diseases
Abstinence programs “shar[e] the realities” of STIs and provide accurate information about contraception “but always within the context of abstinence as the healthiest choice,” Huber writes, concluding, “The health and future of our teens depend on a common-sense approach that works” (Huber, USA Today, 7/30).
From USA Today: Opposing view: Abstinence works
At TellThem!, we believe, while abstinence-only may work as a birth control method that prevents pregnancy with 100% certainty, abstinence-only as a primary policy for preventing teen pregnancy is not sufficient. Our young people must receive the medically accurate information and education they need to avoid the high-risk behaviors that lead to unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections such as HIV.
What do you believe?
The USA Today has published both an editorial againstabstinence-only education as well as an opposing piece supporting abstinence-only education.
Here are two quotes from the Kaiser Network:
Teaching abstinence has “always had a certain appeal,” but it is “not a time for wishful thinking” because recent studies have suggested that the “decline in the rate of teens having sex has plateaued” (USA Today, 7/30).
From USA Today: Our view on sex education: Abstinence-only fails to stop early pregnancies, diseases
Abstinence programs “shar[e] the realities” of STIs and provide accurate information about contraception “but always within the context of abstinence as the healthiest choice,” Huber writes, concluding, “The health and future of our teens depend on a common-sense approach that works” (Huber, USA Today, 7/30).
From USA Today: Opposing view: Abstinence works
At TellThem!, we believe, while abstinence-only may work as a birth control method that prevents pregnancy with 100% certainty, abstinence-only as a primary policy for preventing teen pregnancy is not sufficient. Our young people must receive the medically accurate information and education they need to avoid the high-risk behaviors that lead to unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections such as HIV.
What do you believe?
August 2, 2007
Real Teens. Reel Life.
This video is a bit long but good. This video was awarded the first place prize in the “Real teens. Reel life” video contest sponsored by the Illinois Campaign for Responsible Sex Education. For more information, visit: www.responsiblesexed.org
Watch the video here.
This video is a bit long but good. This video was awarded the first place prize in the “Real teens. Reel life” video contest sponsored by the Illinois Campaign for Responsible Sex Education. For more information, visit: www.responsiblesexed.org
Watch the video here.
July 27, 2007
Thinking globally but acting locally: the case of SC children
Dr. Phillipe Cunningham is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Family Services Research Center at the Medical University of South Carolina.
During his 2005 State of the Union address, President Bush asked first lady Laura Bush to lead a nationwide initiative called “Helping America’s Youth.” This initiative is designed to help at-risk children and teens reach their full potential by connecting them with family, school and community.
This initiative originated out of an overarching concern that many of America’s youth are at high risk of not making a successful transition into adulthood.
They are living in unsafe neighborhoods, lacking nurturance, structure and support, and engaging in risky behaviors (e.g., cigarette smoking, drug use, early sexual activity, dropping out of school). Many of America’s youth are staring at a lifetime of poverty and failure.
But, it is not just high-risk youth that are in trouble. America’s youth are academically lagging behind children from other industrialized nations. In 2003, U.S. students’ average score in science literacy was lower than 18 other countries; our students scored lower than their counterparts in 25 other countries in problem solving; and in mathematics literacy, U.S. students scored lower than their counterparts in 20 other countries. If America’s youth are to successfully compete in a global economy, we must remove impediments to their development such as poverty, inadequate health care, ineffective and inadequate schools, and risky behavior. Sadly, South Carolina’s children are no exception.
As part of the Helping America’s Youth Initiative, Mrs. Bush held a conference in October on the grounds of Howard University that brought together more than 500 parents, civic leaders, faith-based community service providers, researchers, child advocates and child development experts. The conference was designed to review problems facing our youth, and to discuss and recommend possible solutions.
My colleagues and I at the MUSC Family Services Research Center, (directed by Scott W. Henggeler, Ph.D.) have devoted our scientific careers to developing, validating and disseminating clinically-effective mental health and substance abuse services for youth with serious clinical problems and their families.
Our faculty was honored to participate in the first lady’s conference, not because it would validate our work, but because the conference held promise to serve as a catalyst for putting the health and welfare of America’s youth on the national agenda. Such promise has yet to be realized either nationally or locally. With coverage of the war in Iraq and the political scene, the first lady’s conference regrettably failed to garner much attention. This is ironic considering that the future health, vitality, and safety of our nation depend on the well-being of our children.
Unfortunately, key indicators of child well-being would suggest that South Carolina’s children may have a particularly hard time becoming successful adults.
According to South Carolina Kids Count, in 2000 an incredible 37.8 percent of our youth lived 200 percent below the poverty level. But this statistic tells only part of the story.
According to South Carolina Kids Count:
Twenty-six percent of South Carolina mothers get less than adequate prenatal care
Forty percent of babies born in S.C. are born to single mothers
Fourteen percent of students are not academically ready for the first grade
Thirteen percent repeat one of the first three grades
Thirty-three percent of tenth graders fail one or more parts of the exit exam on their first attempt
Thirty-two percent fail to graduate from high school
S.C. ranks 34th in children living in poverty; 49th in teen births; 48th in low birthweight babies; and 48th in single-parent households with children.
These indicators suggest that South Carolina’s children are at high risk of being ill-prepared to compete in America’s economy and no hope of competing in a global economy.
As I mentioned in my brief comments at the first lady’s Helping America’s Youth Conference, public policy must be informed by the realization that helping children means helping their families. This will require three actions:(1) Be brave enough to stop doing what does not work. Many programs that may have curb appeal have no empirical evidence and are unlikely to work because they fail to address the known causes of the problem. These programs may include removing youth to special schools or other institutional placements and using tactics touted as “silver bullets,” and strategies that are politically popular, such as character education, or Scared Straight. The single best predictor of youth engaging in antisocial behavior (e.g., drug use, violence) is association with deviant peers.
(2) Do what is proven to work in helping youth. For example, successful violence prevention programs share several important characteristics. They have targeted the known causes and correlates of the behavior; they have demonstrated a significant deterrent effect; they have demonstrated effectiveness via rigorous experimental designs (e.g., random assignment); and they have sustained effects over time. Some of the more successful programs that target antisocial behavior include Multisystemic Therapy, Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses, Behavioral Parent Training, Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care, and Functional Family Therapy.
(3) Let researchers who are good stewards of taxpayer dollars (National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism produce scientific evidence to help influence policies related to the prevention and reduction of serious behavior problems in youth.
In my opinion, it is only through these steps that South Carolina can overcome some of the obstacles facing our children and help them fulfill the promise of successful, productive lives. We owe it to our children to recognize when there are problems that need to be addressed, to identify solutions that work (based on scientific evidence), and to support them along the way.
The future of our country and the state of South Carolina depends on it. Together with Mrs. Bush, my colleague and I are committed to this cause. We invite you to educate yourself about the subject and to do your part.
More information about this subject is available at: http://www.helpingamericasyouth.gov.
Visit the Family Services Research Center Web site at: http://www.musc.edu/psychiatry/research/fsrc/abt_fsrc.htm
Dr. Phillipe Cunningham is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Family Services Research Center at the Medical University of South Carolina.
During his 2005 State of the Union address, President Bush asked first lady Laura Bush to lead a nationwide initiative called “Helping America’s Youth.” This initiative is designed to help at-risk children and teens reach their full potential by connecting them with family, school and community.
This initiative originated out of an overarching concern that many of America’s youth are at high risk of not making a successful transition into adulthood.
They are living in unsafe neighborhoods, lacking nurturance, structure and support, and engaging in risky behaviors (e.g., cigarette smoking, drug use, early sexual activity, dropping out of school). Many of America’s youth are staring at a lifetime of poverty and failure.
But, it is not just high-risk youth that are in trouble. America’s youth are academically lagging behind children from other industrialized nations. In 2003, U.S. students’ average score in science literacy was lower than 18 other countries; our students scored lower than their counterparts in 25 other countries in problem solving; and in mathematics literacy, U.S. students scored lower than their counterparts in 20 other countries. If America’s youth are to successfully compete in a global economy, we must remove impediments to their development such as poverty, inadequate health care, ineffective and inadequate schools, and risky behavior. Sadly, South Carolina’s children are no exception.
As part of the Helping America’s Youth Initiative, Mrs. Bush held a conference in October on the grounds of Howard University that brought together more than 500 parents, civic leaders, faith-based community service providers, researchers, child advocates and child development experts. The conference was designed to review problems facing our youth, and to discuss and recommend possible solutions.
My colleagues and I at the MUSC Family Services Research Center, (directed by Scott W. Henggeler, Ph.D.) have devoted our scientific careers to developing, validating and disseminating clinically-effective mental health and substance abuse services for youth with serious clinical problems and their families.
Our faculty was honored to participate in the first lady’s conference, not because it would validate our work, but because the conference held promise to serve as a catalyst for putting the health and welfare of America’s youth on the national agenda. Such promise has yet to be realized either nationally or locally. With coverage of the war in Iraq and the political scene, the first lady’s conference regrettably failed to garner much attention. This is ironic considering that the future health, vitality, and safety of our nation depend on the well-being of our children.
Unfortunately, key indicators of child well-being would suggest that South Carolina’s children may have a particularly hard time becoming successful adults.
According to South Carolina Kids Count, in 2000 an incredible 37.8 percent of our youth lived 200 percent below the poverty level. But this statistic tells only part of the story.
According to South Carolina Kids Count:
Twenty-six percent of South Carolina mothers get less than adequate prenatal care
Forty percent of babies born in S.C. are born to single mothers
Fourteen percent of students are not academically ready for the first grade
Thirteen percent repeat one of the first three grades
Thirty-three percent of tenth graders fail one or more parts of the exit exam on their first attempt
Thirty-two percent fail to graduate from high school
S.C. ranks 34th in children living in poverty; 49th in teen births; 48th in low birthweight babies; and 48th in single-parent households with children.
These indicators suggest that South Carolina’s children are at high risk of being ill-prepared to compete in America’s economy and no hope of competing in a global economy.
As I mentioned in my brief comments at the first lady’s Helping America’s Youth Conference, public policy must be informed by the realization that helping children means helping their families. This will require three actions:(1) Be brave enough to stop doing what does not work. Many programs that may have curb appeal have no empirical evidence and are unlikely to work because they fail to address the known causes of the problem. These programs may include removing youth to special schools or other institutional placements and using tactics touted as “silver bullets,” and strategies that are politically popular, such as character education, or Scared Straight. The single best predictor of youth engaging in antisocial behavior (e.g., drug use, violence) is association with deviant peers.
(2) Do what is proven to work in helping youth. For example, successful violence prevention programs share several important characteristics. They have targeted the known causes and correlates of the behavior; they have demonstrated a significant deterrent effect; they have demonstrated effectiveness via rigorous experimental designs (e.g., random assignment); and they have sustained effects over time. Some of the more successful programs that target antisocial behavior include Multisystemic Therapy, Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses, Behavioral Parent Training, Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care, and Functional Family Therapy.
(3) Let researchers who are good stewards of taxpayer dollars (National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism produce scientific evidence to help influence policies related to the prevention and reduction of serious behavior problems in youth.
In my opinion, it is only through these steps that South Carolina can overcome some of the obstacles facing our children and help them fulfill the promise of successful, productive lives. We owe it to our children to recognize when there are problems that need to be addressed, to identify solutions that work (based on scientific evidence), and to support them along the way.
The future of our country and the state of South Carolina depends on it. Together with Mrs. Bush, my colleague and I are committed to this cause. We invite you to educate yourself about the subject and to do your part.
More information about this subject is available at: http://www.helpingamericasyouth.gov.
Visit the Family Services Research Center Web site at: http://www.musc.edu/psychiatry/research/fsrc/abt_fsrc.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)